medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Development and validation of polygenic scores for within-family prediction of disease risks
Spencer Moore, Ivan DavidsoniD, Jonathan AnomalyiD, Jeremiah H. LiiD, Mohammad Mehdi AhangariiD, Lauren Moissiy, Michael Christensen, Alexander I. YoungiD, David Stern, Tobias WolframiD
Abstract
The clinical implementation of polygenic scores (PGSs) for disease risk prediction, particularly in reproductive health applications, requires rigorous validation. Here, we develop seventeen disease PGSs by conducting large-scale GWAS meta-analyses, and we validate our scores in out-of-sample prediction analyses. We achieve state-of-the-art predictive performance, consistently matching or outperforming academic and commercial benchmarks, with liability R2 reaching up to 0.21 (type 2 diabetes). The performance of a PGS for embryo screening depends on its predictive ability within-family, which can be lower than its prediction ability among unrelated individuals. However, very few disease PGSs have been tested within-family. We perform systematic within-family validation of our disease PGSs, finding no decrease in predictive performance within-family for 16 of 17 scores. PGS performance typically declines with genetic distance from training data, an effect that needs to be accounted for to give properly calibrated predictions across ancestries. We perform extensive calibration of our scores performance across different ancestries, finding improved cross-ancestry performance compared to previous approaches, especially in African and East Asian populations. This is likely due to the fact our scores are constructed using a method that incorporates functional genomic annotations on more than 7 million variants, enabling a degree of fine-mapping of causal variants shared across ancestries. We illustrate clinical utility through examining the risk reduction that could be achieved through embryo screening for type 2 diabetes: selecting among 10 embryos is expected to reduce absolute disease risk by 12-20% in families where both parents are affected, with similar relative risk reductions across ancestries. These findings establish a framework for implementing PGS in reproductive medicine while demonstrating both the technologys potential for disease prevention and the methodological standards required for responsible clinical translation.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Within- and Between-Family Validation of Nine Polygenic Risk Scores Developed in 1.5 Million Individuals: Implications for IVF, Embryo Selection, and Reduction in Lifetime Disease Risk
Stephan Cordogan, DB Starr, … Lasse Folkersen·medRxiv·Oct 24, 2025
- Performance of polygenic risk scores in screening, prediction, and risk stratification
Aroon Dinesh Hingorani, Jasmine Gratton, … NJ Wald·medRxiv·Feb 18, 2022
- The Polygenic Score Catalog: an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation
Samuel A. Lambert, Laurent Gil, … Michael Inouye·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2021
- Incorporating family history of disease improves polygenic risk scores in diverse populations
Margaux L.A. Hujoel, Po‐Ru Loh, … Alkes L. Price·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- Within-Family Validation of Polygenic Risk Scores and Complex Trait Prediction
Louis Lello, Timothy G. Raben, Stephen Hsu·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2020
- Prediction of Polygenic Risks by Screening Thousands of Polygenic Scores
Wei‐Min Chen, Ani W Manichaikul, … Stephen S. Rich·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2025