Spinal cord associative plasticity improves forelimb sensorimotor function after cervical injury

Associative plasticity occurs when two stimuli converge on a common neural target. Previous efforts to promote associative plasticity have targeted cortex, with variable and moderate effects. In addition, the targeted circuits are inferred, rather than tested directly. In contrast, we sought to target the strong convergence between motor and sensory systems in the spinal cord. We developed spinal cord associative plasticity (SCAP), precisely timed pairing of motor cortex and dorsal spinal cord stimulations, to target this interaction. We tested the hypothesis that properly timed paired stimulation would strengthen the sensorimotor connections in the spinal cord and improve recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). We tested physiological effects of paired stimulation, the pathways that mediate it, and its function in a preclinical trial. Subthreshold spinal cord stimulation strongly augmented motor cortex evoked muscle potentials at the time they were paired, but only when they arrived synchronously in the spinal cord. This paired stimulation effect depended on both cortical descending motor and spinal cord proprioceptive afferents; selective inactivation of either of these pathways fully abrogated the paired stimulation effect. SCAP, repetitive pairing of these pathways for 5 or 30 minutes in awake rats, increased spinal excitability for hours after pairing ended. To apply SCAP as therapy, we optimized the parameters to promote strong and long-lasting effects. This effect was just as strong in rats with cervical SCI as in uninjured rats, demonstrating that spared connections after moderate SCI were sufficient to support plasticity. In a blinded trial, rats received a moderate C4 contusive SCI. Ten days after injury, they were randomized to 30 minutes of SCAP each day for 10 days or sham stimulation. Rats with SCAP had significantly improved function on the primary outcome measure, a test of dexterity during manipulation of food, at 50 days after SCI. In addition, rats with SCAP had persistently stronger responses to cortical and spinal stimulation than sham stimulation rats, indicating a spinal locus of plasticity. SCAP rats had lasting improvements in H-reflex modulation. The groups had no difference in the rat grimace scale, a measure of pain. We conclude that SCAP strengthens sensorimotor connections within the spinal cord, resulting in improved reflex modulation and forelimb function after moderate SCI. Since both motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation are performed routinely in humans, this approach can be trialed in people with SCI or other disorders that damage sensorimotor connections and impair dexterity.