Questioning unexpected CRISPR off-target mutations in vivo

Abstract

To the Editor To the Editor References Recently, Schaefer et al.1 reported that whole genome sequencing (WGS) of two Cas9-treated, gene-corrected mice and a wild-type control mouse unveiled 1,397 single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) and 117 small insertions and deletions (indels) present commonly in the two Cas9-treated mice \"but absent in the uncorrected control\" and from a database of mouse SNVs and indels. There was essentially no sequence homology between the on-target site and these SNVs and indel sites, most of which lacked a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence, suggesting that these variations were both small guide RNA (sgRNA)-independent and Cas9-independent, respectively. Nevertheless, the authors made a bold claim that these variations were caused by CRISPR-Cas9 without validating these unexpected off-target effects even at a single SNV or indel site by ...