bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Unexpected CRISPR off-target mutation pattern in vivo are not typicallygermline-like
Zhiting WeiiD, Funan HeiD, Guohui ChuaiiD, Hanhui MaiD, Zhixi SuiD, Qi LiuiD
Abstract
To the EditorSchaefer et al.1 (referred to as Study_1) recently presented the provocative conclusion that CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease can induce many unexpected off-target mutations across the genome that arise from the sites with poor homology to the gRNA. As Wilson et al.2 pointed out, however, the selection of a co-housed mouse as the control is insufficient to attribute the observed mutation differences between the CRISPR-treated mice and control mice. Therefore, the causes of these mutations need to be further investigated. In 2015, Iyer et al.3 (referred to as Study_2) used Cas9 and a pair of sgRNAs to mutate the Ar gene in vivo and off-target mutations were investigated by comparison the control mice and the offspring of the modified mice. After analyzing the whole genome sequencing (WGS) of the offspring and the control mice, they claimed that off-target mutations are rare from CRISPR-Cas9 engineering. Notably, their study only focused on indel off-target mutations. We re-analyzed the WGS data of these two studies and detected both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indel mutations.
- organism: mouse
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Questioning unexpected CRISPR off-target mutations in vivo
Sang‐Tae Kim, Jeongbin Park, … Jin‐Soo Kim·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2018
- "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo" are most likely pre-existing sequence variants and not nuclease-induced mutations
Caleb A. Lareau, Kendell Clement, … Luca Pinello·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2018
- The experimental design and data interpretation in “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo” by Schaefer et al. are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the authors
Christopher J. Wilson, Tim J. Fennell, … Vic E. Myer·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2017
- Analysis of single nucleotide variants in CRISPR-Cas9 edited zebrafish embryos shows no evidence of off-target inflation
Marie R. Mooney, Erica E. Davis, Nicholas Katsanis·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2019
- Corrigendum and follow-up: Whole genome sequencing of multiple CRISPR-edited mouse lines suggests no excess mutations.
Kellie A. Schaefer, Benjamin W Darbro, … Vinit B. Mahajan·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2018
- CRISPR-Cas9 induces large structural variants at on-target and off-target sites in vivo that segregate across generations
Ida Höijer, Anastasia Emmanouilidou, … Adam Ameur·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2022