Communications BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Consensus tissue domain detection in spatial -omics data using MILWRM
Harsimran KauriD, Cody N. HeiseriD, Eliot T. McKinleyiD, Lissa Ventura‐AntunesiD, Coleman R. HarrisiD, Joseph T. RolandiD, Melissa A. FarrowiD, Hilary J. Selden, Ellie L. PingryiD, John F. Moore, Lauren I. R. EhrlichiD, Martha J. ShrubsoleiD, Jeffrey M. SpragginsiD, Robert J. CoffeyiD, Ken S. LauiD, Simon VandekariD
Abstract
Spatially resolved molecular assays provide high dimensional genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenetic information in situ and at various resolutions. Pairing these data across modalities with histological features enables powerful studies of tissue pathology in the context of an intact microenvironment and tissue structure. Increasing dimensions across molecular analytes and samples require new data science approaches to functionally annotate spatially resolved molecular data. A specific challenge is data-driven cross-sample domain detection that allows for analysis within and between consensus tissue compartments across high volumes of multiplex datasets stemming from tissue atlasing efforts. Here, we present MILWRM - multiplex image labeling with regional morphology - a Python package for rapid, multi-scale tissue domain detection and annotation. We demonstrate MILWRMs utility in identifying histologically distinct compartments in human colonic polyps and mouse brain slices through spatially-informed clustering in two different spatial data modalities. Additionally, we used tissue domains detected in human colonic polyps to elucidate molecular distinction between polyp subtypes. We also explored the ability of MILWRM to identify anatomical regions of mouse brain and their respective distinct molecular profiles.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- assay: proteomics
- assay: imaging
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial domain detection using contrastive self-supervised learning for spatial multi-omics technologies
Jianing Yao, Jinglun Yu, … Stephanie C. Hicks·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- SpaMOAL: A spatial multi-omics graph contrastive learning method for spatial domains identification
Jinxia Wang, Yuying Huo, … Xiangyu Li·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2026
- Unsupervised discovery of tissue architecture in multiplexed imaging
Junbum Kim, Samir Rustam, … Olivier Elemento·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2022
- stMMR: accurate and robust spatial domain identification from spatially resolved transcriptomics with multi-modal feature representation
Daoliang Zhang, Na Yu, … Rui Gao·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2024
- Data-driven fine-grained region discovery in the mouse brain with transformers
Alex J. Lee, Alma Dubuc, … Reza Abbasi-Asl·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2025
- MuCST: restoring and integrating heterogeneous morphology images and spatial transcriptomics data with contrastive learning
Yu Wang, Zaiyi Liu, Xiaoke Ma·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2025