Modulating Motor Cortex Plasticity via Cortical and Peripheral Somatosensory Stimulation
Abstract
The interaction between the motor and somatosensory systems is essential for effective motor control, with evidence indicating that somatosensory stimulation influences the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the mechanisms by which repetitive stimulation of both cortical and peripheral somatosensory systems affects M1 plasticity are not well understood. To investigate this, we examined the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) applied to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve on various measures of corticospinal excitability and M1 intracortical circuits. Specifically, we assessed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) before and after administering cTBS and TENS. Our results demonstrated that cTBS increased MEPs for at least 50 minutes, whereas TENS increased MEPs for 10 minutes. Neither cTBS nor TENS had an impact on SICI and ICF. However, cTBS decreased SAI, while TENS did not affect SAI. The sham procedures for both cTBS and TENS did not produce significant changes in MEPs, SICI, ICF, or SAI. These findings suggest that both cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation modulate corticospinal excitability, with the effects of cortical stimulation being more prolonged. Neither type of stimulation influences inhibitory and excitatory intracortical neural circuitry within M1. Notably, cortical somatosensory stimulation modulates the interaction between M1 and S1, whereas peripheral somatosensory stimulation does not. This study elucidates distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence M1 plasticity. NEW & NOTEWORTHYThis study identifies distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence motor cortex (M1) plasticity. Both continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve enhance corticospinal excitability, with cTBS exhibiting longer-lasting effects. Importantly, cTBS, but not TENS, modulates the interaction between M1 and S1. These findings form the basis for developing targeted somatosensory interventions aimed at modulating motor function.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Corticospinal excitability is influenced by the recent history of electrical digital stimulation: implications for the relative magnitude of short-latency afferent inhibition
Marie Trolle Bonnesen, Søren A. Fuglsang, … Lasse Christiansen·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortex
Natalya D. Shelchkova, John E. Downey, … Sliman J. Bensmaı̈a·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2023
- Motor cortex can modulate somatosensory processing via cortico-thalamo-cortical pathway
Michael Lohse, Matthew Cooper, … Edward O. Mann·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018
- Pain and touch differentially modulate corticospinal excitability, independent of afferent inhibition
Louisa Gwynne, Luigi Tamè·bioRxiv·May 9, 2025
- Repetitive suprathreshold paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation alters corticospinal excitability
Suraj Suresh, Wei‐Yeh Liao, … Nigel C. Rogasch·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Sensory Entrained TMS (seTMS) enhances motor cortex plasticity
Jessica Marie Ross, Lily Forman, … Corey J. Keller·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2025