henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsPhysiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Modulation of intestinal bile acids influences colonic mucosal responses

Esther WortmanniD, Tanja GrolliD, Anne Strigli, Kenneth PeukeriD, Colin VoletiD, Leona Arps, Rizlan Bernier‐LatmaniiD, Sebastian ZeißigiD, Katja SteigeriD, Moritz A. MiddelhoffiD, Thomas ClaveliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundElevated levels of secondary bile acids produced by the gut microbiome, in particular deoxycholic acid (DCA), influence epithelial cell proliferation and accelerate the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) under adverse dietary conditions, such as long-term, high fat intake. However, their effects on the intestinal epithelium have not been studied in detail. AimTo determine gut epithelial responses to bile acid modulation in vivo and in situ. MethodsWe performed targeted colonization of gnotobiotic mice followed by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) of colonic epithelial cells combined with immunostaining of human biopsies from: (i) an observational patient cohort with hyperproliferative polyps or cancer; (ii) an interventional study with bile acid-scavenging drugs. ResultsColonization of mice with a synthetic bacterial community together with the 7-dehydroxylating species Extibacter muris resulted in DCA production. ScRNA-Seq of colonic epithelial cells revealed increased cell density of bile acid-sensitive enterocytes but fewer stem cells, goblet cells, and transit amplifying cells in mice exposed to DCA. This was associated with increased expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (Pdk4) and decreased expression of mucin (Muc2). PDK expression was also increased in human hyperplastic polyps and adenomas, whilst MUC2 expression was reduced in adenomas and carcinomas compared to normal mucosa. In addition, human exposure to bile acid sequestrants was associated with enhanced epithelial proliferation. ConclusionThis study provides insight into intestinal epithelial cell responses to bile acids and their potential clinical relevance.

Citations
1
FWCI
2.05
Field percentile
top 22%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.