Genetic program activity delineates risk, relapse, and therapy responsiveness in Multiple Myeloma
Matthew A. WalliD, Serdar TurkarslaniD, Wei‐Ju WuiD, Samuel A. DanzigeriD, David J. ReissiD, Mike J. MasoniD, Andrew DervaniD, Matthew W. B. TrotteriD, Douglas E. BassettiD, Robert Mark Hershberg, Adrián López García de LomanaiD, Alexander V. RatushnyiD, Nitin S. BaligaiD
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), nearly all patients ultimately relapse and many become refractory to their previous therapies. Although many therapies exist with diverse mechanisms of action, it is not yet clear how the differences in MM biology across patients impacts the likelihood of success for existing therapies and those in the pipeline. Therefore, we not only need the ability to predict which patients are at high risk for disease progression, but also a means to understand the mechanisms underlying their risk. We hypothesized that knowledge of the biological networks that give rise to MM, specifically the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) and the mechanisms by which mutations impact gene regulation, would enable improved predictions of disease progression and actionable insights for treatment. Here we present a method to infer TRNs from multi-omics data and apply it to the generation of a MM TRN that links chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutations to downstream effects on gene expression via perturbation of transcriptional regulators. We find that 141 genetic programs underlie the disease and that the activity profile of these programs fall into one of 25 distinct transcriptional states. These transcriptional signatures prove to be more predictive of outcomes than do mutations and reveal plausible mechanisms for relapse, including the establishment of an immuno-suppressive microenvironment. Moreover, we observe subtype-specific vulnerabilities to interventions with existing drugs and motivate the development of new targeted therapies that appear especially promising for relapsed refractory MM.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integrative multi-omics identifies high risk Multiple Myeloma segment associated with significant DNA loss and dysregulated DNA repair and cell cycle pathways
M. Ortiz Estevez, M. Samur, … A. Thakurta·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2021
- Patient Similarity Network of Multiple Myeloma Identifies Patient Sub-groups with Distinct Genetic and Clinical Features
S. Bhalla, D. T. Melnekoff, … S. Parekh·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2020
- Genomic Basis of Multiple Myeloma Subtypes from the MMRF CoMMpass Study
Sheri Skerget, Daniel Peñaherrera, … Jonathan J. Keats·medRxiv·Aug 2, 2021
- Germline and somatic genetic effects on gene expression and outcome in patients with Multiple Myeloma
Heini M. Natri, Linh T. Bui, … Nicholas E. Banovich·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2024
- Mapping Disease Transitions from Premalignant, Asymptomatic to Advanced Myeloma through Integrative Epigenomic and Transcriptional Analyses
Aleksandra K. Kurowska, Azari Bantan, … David Gómez-Cabrero·BloodPeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2024
- Genetic Subtypes of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma are associated with Distinct Pathogenic Phenotypes and Clinical Outcomes
M. Bustoros, S. Anand, … I. M. Ghobrial·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2021