Phase dependence of response curves to stimulation and their relationship: from a Wilson-Cowan model to essential tremor patient data
Benoit DuchetiD, Gihan WeerasingheiD, Hayriye CagnaniD, Peter BrowniD, Christian BickiD, Rafał BogacziD
Abstract
Essential tremor manifests predominantly as a tremor of the upper limbs. One therapy option is high-frequency deep brain stimulation, which continuously delivers electrical stimulation to the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus at about 130 Hz. Investigators have been looking at stimulating less, chiefly to reduce side effects. One strategy, phase-locked deep brain stimulation, consists of stimulating according to the phase of the tremor, once per period. In this study, we aim to reproduce the phase dependent effects of stimulation seen in patient data with a biologically inspired Wilson-Cowan model. To this end, we first analyse patient data, and conclude that half of the datasets have response curves that are better described by sinusoidal curves than by straight lines, while an effect of phase cannot be consistently identified in the remaining half. Using the Hilbert phase we derive analytical expressions for phase and amplitude responses to phase-dependent stimulation and study their relationship in the linearisation of a stable focus model, a simplification of the Wilson-Cowan model in the stable focus regime. Analytical results provide a good approximation for response curves observed in patients with consistent significance. Additionally, we fitted the full non-linear Wilson-Cowan model to these patients, and we show that the model can fit in each case to the dynamics of patient tremor as well as the phase response curve, and the best fits are found to be stable foci for each patients (tied best fit in one instance). The model provides satisfactory prediction of how patient tremor will react to phase-locked stimulation by predicting patient amplitude response curves although they were not explicitly fitted. This can be partially explained by the relationship between the response curves in the model being compatible with what is found in the data. We also note that the non-linear Wilson-Cowan model is able to describe response to stimulation more precisely than the linearisation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model
Gihan Weerasinghe, Benoit Duchet, … Rafał Bogacz·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- Modeling mechanisms of tremor reduction for essential tremor using symmetric biphasic DBS
Shane Lee, Wael F. Asaad, Stephanie R. Jones·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2019
- Decoding voluntary movements and postural tremor based on thalamic LFPs for closed-loop stimulation for essential tremor
Huiling Tan, Jean Debarros, … Peter Brown·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Feb 23, 2019
- Response of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation: model-based predictions and validation
Nima Mirkhani, Colin G. McNamara, … Rafał Bogacz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2025
- Evoked Resonant Neural Activity Long-Term Dynamics can be Reproduced by a Computational Model with Vesicle Depletion
James J. Sermon, Christoph Wiest, … Benoit Duchet·Neurobiology of DiseasePeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2024
- Connectivity profile of thalamic deep brain stimulation to effectively treat essential tremor
Bassam Al‐Fatly, Siobhán Ewert, … Andrea A. Kühn·BrainPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2019