A mathematical framework to correct for compositionality in microbiome datasets
Samuel P. ForryiD, Stephanie L. ServetasiD, Jason G. KraljiD, Monique E. HunteriD, Jennifer N. Dootz, Scott A. JacksoniD
Abstract
The increasing use of metagenomic sequencing (MGS) for microbiome analysis has significantly advanced our understanding of microbial communities and their roles in various biological processes, including human health, environmental cycling, and disease. However, the inherent compositionality of MGS data, where the relative abundance of each taxa depends on the abundance of all other taxa, complicates the measurement of individual taxa and the interpretation of microbiome data. Here we describe an experimental design that incorporates exogenous internal standards in routine MGS analyses to correct for compositional distortions. A mathematical framework was developed for using the observed internal standard relative abundance to calculate "Scaled Abundances" for native taxa that were (i) independent of sample composition and (ii) directly proportional to actual biological abundances. Through rigorous analysis of mock community and human gut microbiome samples, we demonstrate that Scaled Abundances outperformed traditional relative abundance measurements in both precision and accuracy and enabled reliable, quantitative comparisons of individual microbiome taxa across varied sample compositions and across a wide range of taxa abundances. By providing a pathway to accurate taxa quantification, this approach holds significant potential for advancing microbiome research, particularly in clinical and environmental health applications where precise microbial profiling is critical. ImportanceMetagenomic sequencing (MGS) analysis has become central to modern characterizations of microbiome samples. However, the inherent compositionality of these analyses often complicate interpretations of results. We present here an experimental design and corresponding mathematical framework that uses internal standards with routine MGS methods to correct for compositional distortions. We validate this approach for both amplicon and shotgun MGS analysis of mock communities and human gut microbiome (fecal) samples. By using internal standards to remove compositionality, we demonstrate significantly improved measurement accuracy and precision for quantification of taxa abundances. This approach is broadly applicable across a wide range of microbiome research applications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Consistent and correctable bias in metagenomic sequencing measurements
Michael R. McLaren, Amy D. Willis, Benjamin J. Callahan·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2019
- Variability and Bias in Microbiome Metagenomic Sequencing: an Interlaboratory Study Comparing Experimental Protocols
S. P. Forry, S. L. Servetas, … S. A. Jackson·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2023
- Calibrating for absolute microbiome abundances without spike-ins
Nimrod Theodoor de Wit, Amulya Baral, … Patrick Munk·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2026
- TaxaNorm: a novel taxa-specific normalization approach for microbiome data
Ziyue Wang, Dillon Lloyd, … Alison A. Motsinger‐Reif·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2024
- MUSiCC: A marker genes based framework for metagenomic normalization and accurate profiling of gene abundances in the microbiome.
Ohad Manor, Elhanan Borenstein·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2014
- Taxon disappearance from microbiome analysis indicates need for mock communities as a standard in every sequencing run
Y.-C. Yeh, D. Needham, … J. Fuhrman·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2017