bioRxivMicrobiology
Taxon disappearance from microbiome analysis indicates need for mock communities as a standard in every sequencing run
Abstract
Mock communities have been used in microbiome method development to help estimate biases introduced in PCR amplification, sequencing, and to optimize pipeline outputs. Nevertheless, the necessity of routine mock community analysis beyond initial method development is rarely, if ever, considered. Here we report that our routine use of mock communities as internal standards allowed us to discover highly aberrant and strong biases in the relative proportions of multiple taxa in a single Illumina HiSeqPE250 run. In this run, an important archaeal taxon virtually disappeared from all samples, and other mock community taxa showed >2-fold high or low abundance, whereas a rerun of those identical amplicons (from the same reaction tubes) on a different date yielded \"normal\" results. Although obvious from the strange mock community results, due to natural variation of microbiomes at our site, we easily could have missed the problem had we not used the mock communities. The \"normal\" results were validated over 4 MiSeqPE300 runs and 3 HiSeqPE250 runs, and run-to-run variation was usually low (Bray-Curtis distance was 0.12{+/-}0.04). While validating these \"normal\" results, we also discovered some mock microbial taxa had relatively modest, but consistent, differences between sequencing platforms. We suggest that using mock communities in every sequencing run is essential to distinguish potentially serious aberrations from natural variations. Such mock communities should have more than just a few members and ideally at least partly represent the samples being analyzed, to detect problems that show up only in some taxa, as we observed.\n\nImportanceDespite the routine use of standards and blanks in virtually all chemical or physical assays and most biological studies (a kind of \"control\"), microbiome analysis has traditionally lacked such standards. Here we show that unexpected problems of unknown origin can occur in such sequencing runs, and yield completely incorrect results that would not necessarily be detected without the use of standards. Assuming that the microbiome sequencing analysis works properly every time risks serious errors that can be avoided by the use of suitable mock communities.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of microbial communities from diverse biological matrices using mock community as an in situ positive control
G. Galla, N. Praeg, … H. C. Hauffe·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2022
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes
C. S. Poulsen, C. T. Ekstrom, … S. J. Pamp·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Multi-factorial examination of amplicon sequencing workflows from sample preparation to bioinformatic analysis
T. J. De Wolfe, E. S. Wright·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2022
- A Realistic Simulation Framework for EvaluatingMicrobiome Normalization in Sample Stratification and Differential Abundance
Amen Khabeer Al Khafaji, Carolina Gómez‐Llorente, José Camacho·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- Mandatory use of mock communities highlighted by the descriptive comparison of Epi2Me 16S and EMU bioinformatic workflows for full-length 16S rRNA Nanopore sequencing.
Fanie Shedleur-Bourguignon, William P. Thériault, Alexandre Thibodeau·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- Efficient and stable metabarcoding sequencing from DNBSEQ-G400 sequencer examined by large fungal community analysis