henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

BEEM-Static: Accurate inference of ecological interactions from cross-sectional metagenomic data

Chenhao LiiD, Tamar V. Av‐ShalomiD, Jun Wei Gerald TaniD, Junmei Samantha Kwah, Kern Rei ChngiD, Niranjan NagarajaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

MotivationThe structure and function of diverse microbial communities is underpinned by ecological interactions that remain uncharacterized. With rapid adoption of metagenomic sequencing for studying microbiomes, data-driven inference of microbial interactions based on abundance correlations is widely used, but with the drawback that ecological interpretations may not be possible. Leveraging cross-sectional metagenomic datasets for unravelling ecological structure in a scalable manner thus remains an open problem. MethodsWe present an expectation-maximization algorithm (BEEM-Static) that can be applied to cross-sectional datasets to infer interaction networks based on an ecological model (generalized Lotka-Volterra). The method exhibits robustness to violations in model assumptions by using statistical filters to identify and remove corresponding samples. ResultsBenchmarking against 10 state-of-the-art correlation based methods showed that BEEM-Static can infer presence and directionality of ecological interactions even with relative abundance data (AUC-ROC>0.85), a task that other methods struggle with (AUC-ROC<0.63). In addition, BEEM-Static can tolerate a high fraction of samples (up to 40%) being not at steady state or coming from an alternate model. Applying BEEM-Static to a large public dataset of human gut microbiomes (n=4,617) identified multiple stable equilibria that better reflect ecological enterotypes with distinct carrying capacities and interactions for key species. ConclusionBEEM-Static provides new opportunities for mining ecologically interpretable interactions and systems insights from the growing corpus of metagenomic data.

Citations
14
FWCI
0.55
Field percentile
top 41%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.