GeneticsEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Genotypic complexity of Fisher’s geometric model
Abstract
Fishers geometric model was originally introduced to argue that complex adaptations must occur in small steps because of pleiotropic constraints. When supplemented with the assumption of additivity of mutational effects on phenotypic traits, it provides a simple mechanism for the emergence of genotypic epistasis from the nonlinear mapping of phenotypes to fitness. Of particular interest is the occurrence of reciprocal sign epistasis, which is a necessary condition for multipeaked genotypic fitness landscapes. Here we compute the probability that a pair of randomly chosen mutations interacts sign-epistatically, which is found to decrease with increasing phenotypic dimension n, and varies non-monotonically with the distance from the phenotypic optimum. We then derive expressions for the mean number of fitness maxima in genotypic landscapes composed of all combinations of L random mutations. This number increases exponentially with L, and the corresponding growth rate is used as a measure of the complexity of the landscape. The dependence of the complexity on the model parameters is found to be surprisingly rich, and three distinct phases characterized by different landscape structures are identified. Our analysis shows that the phenotypic dimension, which is often referred to as phenotypic complexity, does not generally correlate with the complexity of fitness landscapes and that even organisms with a single phenotypic trait can have complex landscapes. Our results further inform the interpretation of experiments where the parameters of Fisher's model have been inferred from data, and help to elucidate which features of empirical fitness landscapes can be described by this model.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: the correlation of fitness effects of mutations
Luca Ferretti, Benjamin Schmiegelt, … Guillaume Achaz·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2016
- From diminishing returns to entrenchment: a unifying theory of epistasis along adaptive walks revealed by Fisher's geometric model
Arnaud Maillard, Maillard Arnaud, … Olivier Tenaillon·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026
- On the incongruence of genotype-phenotype and fitness landscapes
M. Srivastava, J. L. Payne·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2022
- Mount Fuji's stubby peak: the genotypic density of additive landscapes near maximal fitness
Justin B. Kinney·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2026
- Weakest link epistasis and the geometry of genetic load
Florian Labourel, Florence Bansept, David M. McCandlish·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2026
- The distribution of epistasis on simple fitness landscapes
C. Fraisse, J. J. Welch·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2018