bioRxivBiophysics
Connexin 46 and connexin 50 gap junction channel open stability and unitary conductance are shaped by structural and dynamic features of their N-terminal domains
B. Yue, B. G. Haddad, U. Khan, H. Chen, M. Atalla, Z. Zhang, D. M. Zuckerman, S. L. Reichow, D. Bai
Abstract
The connexins form intercellular communication channels, known as gap junctions (GJs), that facilitate diverse physiological roles in vertebrate species, ranging from electrical coupling and long-range chemical signaling, to coordinating development and nutrient exchange. GJs formed by different connexins are expressed throughout the body and harbor unique channel properties that have not been fully defined mechanistically. Recent structural studies have implicated the amino-terminal (NT) domain as contributing to isoform-specific functional differences that exist between the lens connexins, Cx50 and Cx46. To better understand the structural and functional differences in the two closely related, yet functionally distinct GJs, we constructed models corresponding to CryoEM-based structures of the wildtype Cx50 and Cx46 GJs, NT domain swapped chimeras (Cx46-50NT and Cx50-46NT), and point variants at the 9th residue (Cx46-R9N and Cx50-N9R) for comparative MD simulation and electrophysiology studies. All of these constructs formed functional GJ channels, except Cx46-50NT, which correlated with increased dynamical behavior (instability) of the NT domain observed by MD simulation. Single channel conductance (γj) also correlated well with free-energy landscapes predicted by MD, where γj of Cx46-R9N was increased from Cx46 and the γjs of Cx50-46NT and Cx50-N9R was decreased from Cx50, but to a surprisingly greater degree. Additionally, we observed significant effects on transjunctional voltage-dependent gating (Vj-gating) and open-state dwell times induced by the designed NT domain variants. Together, these studies indicate that the NT domains of Cx46 and Cx50 play an important role in defining channel properties related to open-state stability and single channel conductance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.AbbreviationsGJgap junctionGjgap junctional coupling conductanceγjsingle gap junction channel conductanceIjmacroscopic transjunctional currentijsingle gap junction channel currentCx46sheep connexin 46Cx50sheep connexin 50Vjtransjunctional voltageMDmolecular dynamicsr.m.s.d.root mean square deviationr.m.s.f.root mean square fluctuationPMFpotential of mean forceView Full Text
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-ion permeation and dynamic conductance modulation in connexin gap junction channels
Bassam G. Haddad, Daniel M. Zuckerman, Steve Reichow·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2026
- Distinct modes of N-terminal remodeling through a conserved inhibitor pocket in connexin-46/50
Joshua M. Jarodsky, Janette B. Myers, Steve Reichow·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- Calcium induced N-terminal gating and pore collapse in connexin-46/50 gap junctions
Jonathan A. Flores, Susan E. O'Neill, … Steve Reichow·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2026
- Structure of the connexin-43 gap junction channel in a putative closed state
C. Qi, S. Acosta-Gutierrez, … V. M. Korkhov·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2022
- 4-state model for simulating kinetic and steady-state voltage-dependent gating of gap junctions
M. Snipas, T. Kraujalis, … V. K. Verselis·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2019
- Lipids intercalate and mediate multi-channel assemblies of connexin-46/50 gap junctions
Connor S. Garrels, Janette B. Myers, … Steve Reichow·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2026