Conservation and divergence of DNA replication control in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Abstract
We recently isolated temperature-sensitive cell cycle mutants in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for which the causative mutations were located in genes annotated for potential involvement in DNA replication. Chlamydomonas has a very long G1 period during which cells grow up to ~10-fold without division, followed by rapid cycles of DNA replication and mitosis ( multiple fission). All of the candidate DNA replication mutants tested were defective in completion of the first round of DNA replication, and also failed to produce mitotic spindles. For a subset of the mutants, we rescued temperature-sensitive lethality with tagged transgenes and used the resulting strains to analyze abundance and localization control of the tagged protein. All of the DNA replication proteins tested were essentially undetectable until late G1, accumulated during the period of multiple fission and then were degraded as cells completed their terminal divisions. MCM4 and MCM6 were localized to the nucleus during the division cycle except for transient cytoplasmic localization during mitosis. CDC45 showed strict protein location to the nucleus and co-localized to spindles during mitosis. In contrast, CDC6 was detected in the nucleus only transiently during early divisions within the overall multiple fission cycle. Cdc6 protein levels were very low, but increased upon treatment with MG132, a proteasome inhibitor. We also tested if these DNA replication proteins are regulated by cyclin dependent kinase (CDK). There are two main CDKs in Chlamydomonas, CDKA1 and CDKB1. We found that CDC6 protein level was severely reduced in a cdka1 mutant, but not in a cdkb1 mutant. MG132 did not detectably increase CDC6 levels in the cdka1 mutant, suggesting that CDKA1 upregulates CDC6 at the transcription level. Since MCM4, MCM6 and CDC6 were all essentially undetectable during the long G1 before DNA replication cycles began, we speculate that loading of origins with the MCM helicase may not occur until the end of the long G1, unlike in the budding yeast system. These results provide a microbial framework for approaching replication control in the plant kingdom.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct and sequential re-replication barriers ensure precise genome duplication
Yizhuo Zhou, Pedro N. Pozo, … Jeanette Gowen Cook·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2020
- Mitotic kinase regulation of DNA replication forks
Sudikchya Shrestha, Natasia Paukovich, … Allison W. McClure·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- DDK regulates replication initiation by controlling the multiplicity of Cdc45-GINS binding to Mcm2-7
L. De Jesus Kim, L. J. Friedman, … S. P. Bell·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2020
- Competition for MCM Loading at Origins Establishes Replication Timing Patterns
- Proteasome-dependent Orc6 removal from chromatin upon S-phase entry safeguards against MCM reloading and tetraploidy
Y. Hayashi-Takanaka, I. Hiratani, … Y. Hiraoka·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Concerted activities of Mcm4, Sld3 and Dbf4 in control of origin activation and DNA replication fork progression
Yi-Jun Sheu, Justin B Kinney, Bruce Stillman·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2016