Sign in
Cell BiologyJournal of Cell Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Cross-species molecular mapping of the photoreceptor sensory cilium and periciliary structures identifies conserved and species-specific architectural features

Kei TakahashiiD, Mayuna Obayashi, Raghavi SudharsaniD, William A. BeltraniD

Abstract

Photoreceptor sensory cilia comprise a microtubule-based structural core and the phototransductive outer segment. The microtubule-based ciliary axoneme extends from the basal body through the connecting cilium into the outer segment, thereby linking the inner and outer segments. Around this central axis, specialized periciliary structures are distributed across the apical inner segment and basal outer segment. Yet how these ciliary and periciliary structures differ between rods and cones and across mammals remains incompletely defined. Using ultrastructure expansion microscopy, we compared their nanoscale molecular organization across canine, non-human primate (NHP), and human retinas. Key rod-cone differences in ciliary organization were broadly conserved among all three species, whereas the scale and morphology of individual ciliary subcompartments differed between species. Periciliary structures showed even greater species-specific diversification, particularly in rods. Human photoreceptors shared several structural features with NHP photoreceptors but also displayed inter-individual variability in accessory inner segment-like structure. These findings refine current understanding of photoreceptor sensory cilia and associated periciliary structures in large mammals, revealing that conserved rod-cone differences coexist with pronounced species-specific structural and molecular specializations.

PDFDOI
Full-text digest ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

In-depth summary

✦ Multi-agent verified full-text synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 2 (4 Aug 2026) · CC BY 4.0

Ultrastructure expansion microscopy of dog, macaque and human retinas shows conserved rod-cone differences in the photoreceptor ciliary core but species-divergent periciliary membranes, calyceal processes and rootlets.

Prior expansion microscopy in dog retina resolved nanoscale rod-cone differences in the photoreceptor sensory cilium (PSC), but whether these hold in non-human primates (NHP) and humans had not been systematically tested. A location-matched dog-macaque comparison plus descriptive human data separates conserved from species-specific ciliary and periciliary features, offering a structural hypothesis for why non-primate models poorly mimic Usher type 2 retinopathy.

Key results

  1. ShownRod-cone differences in the microtubule-based ciliary core are conserved in dog, macaque and human: cones have shorter connecting cilia (CC), longer daughter centrioles (DC) and a more pronounced axonemal bulge than rods.

    CEP290-based CC significantly shorter in NHP cones than rods, as in canine, confirmed with SPATA7 and glutamylation; cone DC longer than rod DC in both (three canine, two NHP eyes; Welch's ANOVA, Dunnett's T3); bulge judged qualitatively in axial views. Both human donors kept cone CC < rod CC and cone DC > rod DC despite significant inter-donor differences. · PSC architecture shows shared rod–cone patterns…; Human PSC architecture aligns with primate…; Figure legends

  2. ShownPrimate ciliary cores differ in scale from canine ones: NHP CCs are shorter with stronger distal widening and a larger bulge, NHP cones carry exceptionally long DCs, human data track the primate pattern, and DC length also separates cone subtypes.

    CC significantly shorter in NHP than canine for rods and cones; basal CC axoneme width similar across canine and NHP rods and cones (near the ~200 nm reported in mouse); NHP cone DCs approximately twice other groups, human cones longer still in pooled donor data (descriptive); L/M-cone DCs longer than S-cone DCs in all three species, with no CC difference. · PSC architecture shows shared rod–cone patterns…; Human PSC architecture aligns with primate…; Figure legends

  3. ShownThe USH2 protein Whirlin marks a periciliary membrane confined to the inner segment (IS)-facing side of the CC in canine rods, but encircling the CC in NHP rods, human rods, and canine, NHP and human cones.

    Seen in lateral views, 3D reconstructions, NHS-ester counterstain and axial line profiles; many Whirlin puncta resolved into paired pillar-like elements around the CC; canine cones uniquely had an extra ectopic Whirlin cluster along the IS plasma membrane, present in all canine replicates though variable between cells. · Periciliary structures exhibit rod-cone…; Human periciliary structures are broadly…; Discussion

  4. SuggestedPCDH15 (USH1F) and beta-actin co-patterns indicate calyceal processes in NHP and human rods and in canine, NHP and human cones (more robust in human cones than rods), whereas canine rods seem to lack them or have only minimal versions.

    Canine rods: PCDH15 mostly limited to the IS/OS junction, with discontinuous IS actin lacking PCDH15 association. NHP rods and canine and NHP cones: PCDH15 also extended axially along the basal outer segment (OS), associated with actin filaments reaching from the IS (described as continuous in NHP rods). Human donors matched this, with weaker axial PCDH15 in replicate 1. · Periciliary structures exhibit rod-cone…; Human periciliary structures are broadly…; Discussion

  5. SuggestedAccessory inner segment (aIS)-like extensions containing mitochondria appeared in one of two human donors, in both rods and cones (contrary to the prior rod-only description), and were absent from canine and NHP photoreceptors.

    Donor replicate 2 (84-year-old female): some rods and cones had IS-derived extensions beside the OS holding cytochrome c-positive mitochondria, bounded by an elongated PCDH15-positive junction; tubulin was uneven, resembling the general IS network rather than a dedicated scaffold. Replicate 1 (83-year-old male), canine and NHP cells lacked these. · Human periciliary structures are broadly…; Discussion; Human donor eye tissue; Figure legends

Methods, data and reproducibility

Formaldehyde-fixed archival retinal cryosections were processed by ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM), immunolabeled for ciliary, centriolar, Usher, actin, mitochondrial and rootlet markers with an NHS-ester counterstain, imaged by confocal microscopy, and measured manually, with all values then corrected by a basal-body-derived expansion factor of 3.64.

  • Archival formaldehyde-fixed, cryopreserved retinas from adult dogs (24 weeks old), superior central non-foveal region; reused from prior studies · dog (canine) · n = n = 3 dogs (three canine eyes analyzed)
  • Archival cryopreserved retinas from cynomolgus macaques (4 years old), anatomically matched superior central, non-macular region · Macaca fascicularis (non-human primate) · n = n = 2 (two NHP eyes analyzed)
  • Postmortem donor retinas from the San Diego Eye Bank without ocular pathology; fixed about 3 h after death (7 days fixation) vs about 12 h after death (24 h fixation) · human · n = two donors (83-year-old male, 84-year-old female)
  • Published non-expanded centriole width in U2OS cells (231.3 nm), used as the reference for expansion factor estimation · human (U2OS cell line)
Methods & tools
Ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM), NHS-ester pan-protein counterstaining, Leica STELLARIS 8 confocal microscope (63× water objective, NA 1.20), Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) with LIGHTNING deconvolution, Imaris 10.2.0 (3D rendering), GraphPad Prism 10, Microsoft Excel (line-profile plots), Welch's t-test; Welch's one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's T3 test, Ciliary markers: CEP290, SPATA7, POC5, CEP164, RP1, LCA5, acetylated α-tubulin, glutamylation, Periciliary/other markers: Whirlin, PCDH15, β-actin, cytochrome c, rootletin, tubulins, opsins, WGA and PNA lectin staining of non-expanded sections
Reagents & environment
Imaris 10.2.0 (3D rendering, blend mode); GraphPad Prism 10; Leica LAS X with LIGHTNING deconvolution (default parameters); STELLARIS 8 confocal, 63× water objective NA 1.20, x,y pixel 45.09 nm (lateral views) or 22.55 nm (axial views).
Reproducibility gaps
Numerical source data are in Supplementary Data; raw source images only on reasonable request to the corresponding authors; no code or analysis scripts released, and length measurements were made manually in LAS X.
Limitations (6)
  • Human donors (>80 years) differed from the young canine and NHP animals in age, postmortem delay and fixation, so human data are descriptive, not a matched cross-species comparison; the two donors also differed significantly from each other. · stated by the authors
  • U-ExM gives nanoscale molecular localization but cannot replace electron microscopy for defining ultrastructural boundaries, so calyceal process-like and aIS-like assignments are molecular inferences. · stated by the authors
  • Sizes rely on an expansion factor of 3.64 derived by assuming mother centriole width is conserved across mammals, so values are relative comparisons among identically processed samples rather than absolute dimensions. · stated by the authors
  • Only superior central, non-foveal retina was sampled; primate macula/fovea and the canine area centralis were not examined, so specialized cone populations may differ. · stated by the authors
  • Prevalence, rod versus cone specificity, donor-to-donor consistency and molecular definition of aIS-like structures are still open questions that need larger human cohorts. · stated by the authors
  • Sample sizes are small (three dogs, two macaques, two human donors), and bulge shape, rootlet morphology and periciliary patterns were scored qualitatively without reported cell counts or blinding, so the per-animal frequency of each pattern is unclear. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you study photoreceptor ciliopathies or Usher syndrome models and want rod- versus cone-resolved, cross-species nanoscale maps of the connecting cilium, periciliary membrane and calyceal processes.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTakahashi '25Zhang '23Lewis '25Robichaux '17Bills '24Leung '20
71% semantic matchCell Biology
Kei Takahashi, Raghavi Sudharsan, William A. Beltran·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science·Feb 3, 2025· 7 citations