Library-free BoxCarDIA solves the missing value problem in label-free quantitative proteomics
Abstract
The last decade has seen significant advances in the application of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics technologies to tackle important questions in plant biology. The current standard for quantitative proteomics in plants is the use of data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis with or without the use of chemical labels. However, the DDA approach preferentially measures higher abundant proteins, and often requires data imputation due to quantification inconsistency between samples. In this study we systematically benchmarked a recently developed library-free data-independent acquisition (directDIA) method against a state-of-the-art DDA label-free quantitative proteomics workflow for plants. We next developed a novel acquisition approach combining MS1-level BoxCar acquisition with MS2-level directDIA analysis that we call BoxCarDIA. DirectDIA achieves a 33% increase in protein quantification over traditional DDA, and BoxCarDIA a further 8%, without any changes in instrumentation, offline fractionation, or increases in mass-spectrometer acquisition time. BoxCarDIA, especially, offers wholly reproducible quantification of proteins between replicate injections, thereby addressing the long-standing missing-value problem in label-free quantitative proteomics. Further, we find that the gains in dynamic range sampling by directDIA and BoxCarDIA translate to deeper quantification of key, low abundant, functional protein classes (e.g., protein kinases and transcription factors) that are underrepresented in data acquired using DDA. We applied these methods to perform a quantitative proteomic comparison of dark and light grown Arabidopsis cell cultures, providing a critical resource for future plant interactome studies. Our results establish BoxCarDIA as the new method of choice in quantitative proteomics using Orbitrap-type mass-spectrometers, particularly for proteomes with large dynamic range such as that of plants.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Extensive and accurate benchmarking of DIA acquisition methods and software tools using a complex proteomic standard
Clarisse Gotti, Florence Roux‐Dalvai, … Arnaud Droit·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2021
- JUMPlion improves quantitative DIA proteomics through ion-level recovery of missing values
Yingxue Fu, Zuo-Fei Yuan, … Anthony A. High·bioRxiv·May 1, 2026
- Comprehensive peptide quantification for data independent acquisition mass spectrometry using chromatogram libraries
B. C. Searle, L. K. Pino, … M. J. MacCoss·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2018
- Recommendations for Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) Proteomics using Controlled Quantitative Experiments (CQEs)
Andrew Michael Frey, Frances R. Sidgwick, … Matthias Trost·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025
- Combining data independent acquisition with spike-in SILAC (DIA-SiS) improves proteome coverage and quantification
Anna Sophie Welter, Maximilian Gerwien, … Matthias Selbach·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2024
- IceR improves proteome coverage and data completeness in global and single-cell proteomics
Mathias Kalxdorf, Torsten Müller, … Jeroen Krijgsveld·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2021