Genomic profiling of cell lines reveals hidden research bias and caveats
Abstract
Cancer cell lines are extremely valuable tools for carcinoma research. Biodiversity of cell lines and continuous random mutation in cell lines during passage, however, might result in phenotypic inconsistency and lead to biased experimental conclusions. Using statistics based on known and inferred protein interaction networks, as well as public research literature database, our study shows that essential driver genotypes of cell lines might have hidden impact on research results. Furthermore, by comprehensive genomic profiling of 8 most common used urothelial cell lines and comparing them to previous publications, we found that regardless of similar short tandem repeat (STR) profile, driver gene loss in cell lines could happen by random mutation. Our results suggest that clinical research using urothelial carcinoma cell lines might be influenced by cell line genotypes which could only be determined by next-generation sequencing. Meanwhile, this study indicates that the conditionally reprogrammed cells (CRCs), which closely resemble original tumor tissue, might represent a better alternative for in vitro research, which may be better used for personalized medicine.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How clinically relevant are prostate cancer cell lines? A comprehensive characterisation and multiomics comparison.
Zahra Ahmed, Warda Mosabbir, … Susan Heavey·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2024
- Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of cell lines as models of primary tumor samples across 22 tumor types
Katharine Yu, Bin Chen, … Marina Sirota·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- Matching cell lines with cancer type and subtype of origin via mutational, epigenomic and transcriptomic patterns
Marina Salvadores, Francisco Fuster‐Tormo, Fran Supek·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- Karyotypic divergence confounds cellular phenotypes in large pharmacogenomic studies
Rene Quevedo, Nehme El-Hachem, … Benjamin Haibe-Kains·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2019
- Comparing cancer cell lines and tumor samples by genomic profiles
Rileen Sinha, Nikolaus Schultz, Chris Sander·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2015
- In Search of the Perfect Model: How Cancer Cell Lines Relate to Native Cancers
Rahel Paloots, Ziying Yang, Michael Baudis·bioRxiv·May 15, 2024