Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

Whole-brain modeling explains the context-dependent effects of cholinergic neuromodulation

Carlos Coronel‐OliverosiD, Carsten GießingiD, Vicente MedeliD, Rodrigo CofréiD, Patricio OrioiD

Abstract

Integration and segregation are two fundamental principles of brain organization. The brain manages the transitions and balance between different functional segregated or integrated states through neuromodulatory systems. Recently, computational and experimental studies suggest a pro-segregation effect of cholinergic neuromodulation. Here, we studied the effects of the cholinergic system on brain functional connectivity using both empirical fMRI data and computational modeling. First, we analyzed the effects of nicotine on functional connectivity and network topology in healthy subjects during resting-state conditions and during an attentional task. Then, we employed a whole-brain neural mass model interconnected using a human connectome to simulate the effects of nicotine and investigate causal mechanisms for these changes. The drug effect was modeled decreasing both the global coupling and local feedback inhibition parameters, consistent with the known cellular effects of acetylcholine. We found that nicotine incremented functional segregation in both empirical and simulated data, and the effects are context-dependent: observed during the task, but not in the resting state. In-task performance correlates with functional segregation, establishing a link between functional network topology and behavior. Furthermore, we found in the empirical data that the regional density of the nicotinic acetylcholine 4{beta}2 correlates with the decrease in functional nodal strength by nicotine during the task. Our results confirm that cholinergic neuromodulation promotes functional segregation in a context-dependent fashion, and suggest that this segregation is suited for simple visual-attentional tasks.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
22
FWCI
2.06
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCoronel‐Oli '21Carrette '23Šanda '24Nobukawa '26Ramaswamy '18Chakraborty '23
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Carlos Coronel‐Oliveros, Rodrigo Cofré, Patricio Orio·PLoS Computational Biology·Feb 18, 2021· 30 citations