A novel mapping strategy utilizing mouse chromosome substitution strains identifies multiple epistatic interactions that regulate complex traits
Anna K. MilleriD, Anlu CheniD, Jacquelaine Bartlett, Li Wang, Scott M. WilliamsiD, David A. BuchneriD
Abstract
The genetic contribution of additive versus non-additive (epistatic) effects in the regulation of complex traits is unclear. While genome-wide association studies typically ignore gene-gene interactions, in part because of the lack of statistical power for detecting them, mouse chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) represent an alternate and powerful model for detecting epistasis given their limited allelic variation. Therefore, we utilized CSSs to identify and map both additive and epistatic loci that regulate a range of hematologic- and metabolism-related traits, as well as hepatic gene expression. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified using a CSS-based backcross strategy involving the segregation of variants on the A/J-derived substituted chromosomes 4 and 6 on an otherwise C57BL/6J genetic background. In the liver transcriptomes of offspring from this cross, we identified and mapped additive QTLs regulating the hepatic expression of 768 genes, and epistatic QTL pairs for 519 genes. Similarly, we identified additive QTLs for fat pad weight, platelets, and the percentage of granulocytes in blood, as well as epistatic QTL pairs controlling the percentage of lymphocytes in blood and red cell distribution width. The variance attributed to the epistatic QTL pairs was approximately equal to that of the additive QTLs; however, the SNPs in the epistatic QTL pairs that accounted for the largest variances were undetected in our single locus association analyses. These findings highlight the need to account for epistasis in association studies, and more broadly demonstrate the importance of identifying genetic interactions to understand the complete genetic architecture of complex traits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Widespread Inter-Chromosomal Epistasis Regulates Glucose Homeostasis And Gene Expression
Anlu Chen, Yang Liu, … David A. Buchner·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2017
- A complete chromosome substitution mapping panel reveals genome-wide epistasis in Arabidopsis
Cris L. Wijnen, Ramon Botet, … Joost J. B. Keurentjes·HeredityPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2024
- Modeling Epistasis in Mice and Yeast Using the Proportion of Two or More Distinct Genetic Backgrounds: Evidence for "Polygenic Epistasis"
Christoph D. Rau, Natalia M. Gonzales, … Noah Zaitlen·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2020
- Detecting Epistasis with the Marginal Epistasis Test in Genetic Mapping Studies of Quantitative Traits
Lorin A. Crawford, Ping Zeng, … Xiang Zhou·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2017
- A low resolution epistasis mapping approach to identify chromosome arm interactions in allohexaploid wheat
Nicholas Santantonio, Jean‐Luc Jannink, Mark E. Sorrells·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2018
- Pathway Analysis within Multiple Human Ancestries Reveals Novel Signals for Epistasis in Complex Traits
Michael C. Turchin, Gregory Darnell, … Sohini Ramachandran·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2020