bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
The CUT&RUN Blacklist of Problematic Regions of the Genome
Anna NordiniD, Gianluca ZambaniniiD, Pierfrancesco PagellaiD, Claudio CantùiD
Abstract
Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease (CUT&RUN) is an increasingly popular technique to map genome-wide binding profiles of histone modifications, transcription factors and co-factors. The ENCODE project and others have compiled blacklists for ChIP-seq which have been widely adopted: these lists contain regions of high and unstructured signal, regardless of cell type or protein target. While CUT&RUN obtains similar results to ChIP-seq, its biochemistry and subsequent data analyses are different. We found that this results in a CUT&RUN-specific set of undesired high-signal regions. For this reason, we have compiled blacklists based on CUT&RUN data for the human and mouse genomes, identifying regions consistently called as peaks in negative controls by the CUT&RUN peak caller SEACR. Using published CUT&RUN data from our and other labs, we show that the CUT&RUN blacklist regions can persist even when peak calling is performed with SEACR against a negative control, and after ENCODE blacklist removal. Moreover, we experimentally validated the CUT&RUN Blacklists by performing reiterative negative control experiments in which no specific protein is targeted, showing that they capture >80% of the peaks identified. We propose that removing these problematic regions prior to peak calling can substantially improve the performance of SEACR-based peak calling in CUT&RUN experiments, resulting in more reliable peak datasets.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 7
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking CUT&RUN analysis using motif enrichment
Luomeng Tan, Coby Viner, … Michael M. Hoffman·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2026
- Benchmarking Peak Calling Methods for CUT&RUN
Amin Nooranikhojasteh, Ghazaleh Tavallaee, Elias Orouji·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2025
- CUT&Tag recovers up to half of ENCODE ChIP-seq histone acetylation peaks
Leyla Abbasova, Paulina Urbanaviciute, … Sarah J. Marzi·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2025
- CUT&RUN: Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers
Peter J. Skene, Jorja G. Henikoff, Steven Henikoff·Nature ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2018
- An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites
Peter J. Skene, Steven Henikoff·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2017
- CUT&RUNTools: a flexible pipeline for CUT&RUN processing and footprint analysis
Qian Zhu, Nan Liu, … Guo‐Cheng Yuan·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2019