Sign in
BioengineeringInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Iris Morphological and Biomechanical Factors Influencing Angle Closure During Pupil Dilation

Royston K. Y. TaniD, Gim Yew Ng, Tin A. TuniD, Fabian Albert BraeuiD, Monisha Esther NongpiuriD, Tin AungiD, Michaël J. A. GirardiD

Abstract

PurposeTo use finite element (FE) analysis to assess what morphological and biomechanical factors of the iris and of the anterior chamber are more likely to influence angle narrowing during pupil dilation. MethodsThe study consisted of 1,344 FE models comprising of the cornea, sclera, lens and iris (stroma, sphincter and dilator tissues) to simulate pupil dilation and to assess changes in angle. For each model, we varied the following parameters: anterior chamber depth (ACD = 2 -4 mm) and width (ACW = 10-12 mm), iris convexity (IC = 0-0.3 mm), thickness (IT = 0.3-0.5 mm), stiffness (E = 4-24 kPa) and Poissons ratio (v = 0-0.3), and simulated pupil dilation. We evaluated for the change in anterior chamber angle ({bigtriangleup}{angle}) and the final dilated anterior chamber angles ({angle}f) from baseline to dilation for each parameter. ResultsThe final dilated AC angles decreased with a smaller ACD ({angle}f = 53.4{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 21.3{degrees}{+/-}14.9{degrees}), smaller ACW ({angle}f = 48.2{degrees}{+/-}13.5{degrees} to 26.2{degrees}{+/-}18.2{degrees}), larger IT ({angle}f = 52.6{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 24.4{degrees}{+/-}15.1{degrees}), larger IC ({angle}f = 45.0{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees} to 33.9{degrees}{+/-}16.5{degrees}), larger E ({angle}f = 40.3{degrees}{+/-}17.3{degrees} to 37.4{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees}) and larger v ({angle}f = 42.7{degrees}{+/-}17.7{degrees} to 34.2{degrees}{+/-}18.1{degrees}). The change in AC angle increased with larger ACD ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 9.37{degrees}{+/-}11.1{degrees} to 15.4{degrees}{+/-}9.3{degrees}), smaller ACW ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 7.4{degrees}{+/-}6.8{degrees} to 16.4{degrees}{+/-}11.5{degrees}), larger IT ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.3{degrees}{+/-}7.1{degrees} to 19.3{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), smaller IC ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.4{degrees}{+/-}8.2{degrees} to 19.5{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), larger E ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 10.9{degrees}{+/-}12.2{degrees} to 13.1{degrees}{+/-}8.8{degrees}) and larger v ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 8.1{degrees}{+/-}9.4{degrees} to 16.6{degrees}{+/-}10.4{degrees}). ConclusionsThis parametric study offered valuable insights into the factors that could influence angle closure. The morphology of the iris (IT and IC) and its innate biomechanical behavior (E and v) were crucial in influencing the way the iris deformed during dilation, and angle closure was further exacerbated by decreased AC biometry (ACD and ACW).

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
9
FWCI
3.32
Field percentile
top 8%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTan '25Panda '21Safa '22Liu '24Tan '22Aguirre '19
79% semantic matchBioengineering
Royston K. Y. Tan, Tin A. Tun, Fabian Albert Braeu+2 more·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science·May 27, 2025· 1 citations