Iris Morphological and Biomechanical Factors Influencing Angle Closure During Pupil Dilation
Royston K. Y. TaniD, Gim Yew Ng, Tin A. TuniD, Fabian Albert BraeuiD, Monisha Esther NongpiuriD, Tin AungiD, Michaël J. A. GirardiD
Abstract
PurposeTo use finite element (FE) analysis to assess what morphological and biomechanical factors of the iris and of the anterior chamber are more likely to influence angle narrowing during pupil dilation. MethodsThe study consisted of 1,344 FE models comprising of the cornea, sclera, lens and iris (stroma, sphincter and dilator tissues) to simulate pupil dilation and to assess changes in angle. For each model, we varied the following parameters: anterior chamber depth (ACD = 2 -4 mm) and width (ACW = 10-12 mm), iris convexity (IC = 0-0.3 mm), thickness (IT = 0.3-0.5 mm), stiffness (E = 4-24 kPa) and Poissons ratio (v = 0-0.3), and simulated pupil dilation. We evaluated for the change in anterior chamber angle ({bigtriangleup}{angle}) and the final dilated anterior chamber angles ({angle}f) from baseline to dilation for each parameter. ResultsThe final dilated AC angles decreased with a smaller ACD ({angle}f = 53.4{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 21.3{degrees}{+/-}14.9{degrees}), smaller ACW ({angle}f = 48.2{degrees}{+/-}13.5{degrees} to 26.2{degrees}{+/-}18.2{degrees}), larger IT ({angle}f = 52.6{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 24.4{degrees}{+/-}15.1{degrees}), larger IC ({angle}f = 45.0{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees} to 33.9{degrees}{+/-}16.5{degrees}), larger E ({angle}f = 40.3{degrees}{+/-}17.3{degrees} to 37.4{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees}) and larger v ({angle}f = 42.7{degrees}{+/-}17.7{degrees} to 34.2{degrees}{+/-}18.1{degrees}). The change in AC angle increased with larger ACD ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 9.37{degrees}{+/-}11.1{degrees} to 15.4{degrees}{+/-}9.3{degrees}), smaller ACW ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 7.4{degrees}{+/-}6.8{degrees} to 16.4{degrees}{+/-}11.5{degrees}), larger IT ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.3{degrees}{+/-}7.1{degrees} to 19.3{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), smaller IC ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.4{degrees}{+/-}8.2{degrees} to 19.5{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), larger E ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 10.9{degrees}{+/-}12.2{degrees} to 13.1{degrees}{+/-}8.8{degrees}) and larger v ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 8.1{degrees}{+/-}9.4{degrees} to 16.6{degrees}{+/-}10.4{degrees}). ConclusionsThis parametric study offered valuable insights into the factors that could influence angle closure. The morphology of the iris (IT and IC) and its innate biomechanical behavior (E and v) were crucial in influencing the way the iris deformed during dilation, and angle closure was further exacerbated by decreased AC biometry (ACD and ACW).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Iris Crypts Could Reduce the Chance of Angle Closure: A Computational Biomechanics Study Derived from Clinical and Human Iris Data
Royston K. Y. Tan, Tin A. Tun, … Michaël J. A. Girard·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual SciencePeer-reviewed·May 27, 2025
- Changes in Iris Stiffness and Permeability in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma
S. K. Panda, R. K. Y. Tan, … M. J. A. Girard·bioRxiv·May 4, 2021
- In vivo Biomechanical Assessment of Iridial Deformations and Muscle Contractions in Human Eyes
B. N. Safa, M. R. Bahrani Fard, C. R. Ethier·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2022
- Effect of eye globe and optic nerve morphologies on gaze-induced optic nerve head deformations
Tingting Liu, Pham Tan Hung, … Michaël J. A. Girard·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2024
- The Structural Layers of the Porcine Iris Exhibit Inherently Different Biomechanical Properties
R. K. Y. Tan, S. K. Panda, … M. J. A. Girard·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2022
- A model of the entrance pupil of the human eye
Geoffrey K. Aguirre·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2019