AN INTERNATIONAL INTER-LABORATORY DIGITAL PCR STUDY DEMONSTRATES HIGH REPRODUCIBILITY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF A RARE SEQUENCE VARIANT
Alexandra S Whale, Alison S Devonshire, George Karlin-Neumann, Jack Regan, Leanne Javier, Simon Cowen, Ana Fernandez-Gonzalez, Gerwyn M Jones, Nicholas Redshaw, Julia Beck, Andreas W Berger, Valerie Combaret, Nina Dahl Kjersgaard, Lisa Davis, Frederic Fina, Tim Forshew, Rikke Fredslund Andersen, Silvia Galbiati, Alvaro Gonzalez Hernandez, Charles Haynes, Filip Janku, Roger Lacave, Justin Lee, Vilas Mistry, Alexandra Pender, , Jim Huggett
Abstract
This study tested the claim that digital PCR (dPCR) can offer highly reproducible quantitative measurements in disparate labs. Twenty-one laboratories measured four blinded samples containing different quantities of a KRAS fragment encoding G12D, an important genetic marker for guiding therapy of certain cancers. This marker is challenging to quantify reproducibly using qPCR or NGS due to the presence of competing wild type sequences and the need for calibration. Using dPCR, eighteen laboratories were able to quantify the G12D marker within 12% of each other in all samples. Three laboratories appeared to measure consistently outlying results; however, proper application of a follow-up analysis recommendation rectified their data. Our findings show that dPCR has demonstrable reproducibility across a large number of laboratories without calibration and could enable the reproducible application of molecular stratification to guide therapy, and potentially for molecular diagnostics.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe poor reproducibility of molecular diagnostic methods limits their application in part due to the challenges associated with calibration of what are relative measurement approaches. In this study we investigate the performance of one of the only absolute measurement methods available today, digital PCR (dPCR), and demonstrated that when compared across twenty-one laboratories, dPCR has unprecedented reproducibility. These results were achieved when measuring a challenging single nucleotide variant and without calibration to any reference samples. This opens the possibility for dPCR to offer a method to transform reproducibility in the molecular diagnostic field, both by direct use as well as in support of other currently used clinical methods.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Standardisation of cell-free DNA measurements: An International Study on Comparability of Low Concentration DNA Measurements using cancer variants
Daniel G. Burke, Alison S. Devonshire, … Jim F. Huggett·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2023
- A rapid, multiplex digital PCR assay for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2 variants and ALK, RET, ROS1, NTRK1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer
B. Leatham, K. McNall, … J. Schwartz·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2023
- Lossless and Contamination-Free Digital PCR
- Flexible Methods for Standard Error Calculation in digital PCR Experiments
Yao Chen, Ward De Spiegelaere, … Olivier Thas·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2023
- Robust higher-order multiplexing in digital PCR by color-combination
Irene Santos-Barriopedro, Sylvain Ursuegui, … Rémi Dangla·bioRxiv·May 10, 2023
- Cross-platform digital PCR evaluation of bovine papilloma virus quantification: introducing PCR-ValiPal for Standardized guided assay validation
David Gleerup, Matthijs Vynck, … Ward De Spiegelaere·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2025