bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Standardisation of cell-free DNA measurements: An International Study on Comparability of Low Concentration DNA Measurements using cancer variants
Daniel G. BurkeiD, Alison S. DevonshireiD, Leonardo B. PinheiroiD, Gerwyn M. JonesiD, Kate R. Griffiths, Ana Fernández-GonzáleziD, Michael Forbes-SmithiD, Jacob L. H. McLaughliniD, Kerry R. EmslieiD, Christopher WeidneriD, Joachim Mankertz, John Emerson LeguizamóniD, Marcelo Neves de MedeirosiD, Roberto Becht Flatschart, Antônio Marcos SaraivaiD, P J BeltrãoiD, Carla DivietoiD, Laura ReveliD, Young‐Kyung BaeiD, Lianhua DongiD, Chunyan NiuiD, Xia WangiD, Sasithon TemisakiD, Sachie ShibayamaiD, Burhanettin YalçınkayaiD, , Jim F. HuggettiD
Abstract
For the impact of genomic testing from liquid biopsies to be maximized, mechanisms to ensure reproducible and comparable test performance will be required. This can be established and maintained through reference measurement procedures and materials with property values that are internationally comparable through traceability to a common standard. To achieve this objective, an interlaboratory study was organised to explore digital PCR (dPCR) for standardisation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) quantification. Blinded samples of wild-type/variant mixtures of two DNA sequences (BRAF p.V600E single nucleotide variant or EGFR exon 19 deletion) were provided to 12 laboratories. Laboratories independently designed and applied dPCR assays to determine absolute and relative quantities, with no guidance provided to harmonise the approach. The mean and coefficient of variation (CV) of copy number concentrations for variant sequences were 18 copies/L (CV 7.2%) (BRAF variant sample) and 9 copies/L (CV 25%) (EGFR variant sample) while the mean variant allele frequencies (vAF) were 8.0% (CV 5.3%) and 0.080% (CV 29%) respectively. This study demonstrated that dPCR was capable of exceptional technical accuracy for variant copy number concentration and vAF, even when different assays and platforms were used. This implies that dPCR offers a unique analytical methodology that can be deployed globally in supporting comparability for cfDNA testing based on the existing framework of the International System of units of measurement.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AN INTERNATIONAL INTER-LABORATORY DIGITAL PCR STUDY DEMONSTRATES HIGH REPRODUCIBILITY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF A RARE SEQUENCE VARIANT
Alexandra S Whale, Alison S Devonshire, … Jim Huggett·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2016
- Validating quantitative PCR assays for cell-free DNA detection without DNA extraction: Exercise induced kinetics in systemic lupus erythematosus patients
Elmo W. I. Neuberger, Alexandra Brahmer, … Perikles D. Simon·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2021
- Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis
Havell Markus, Tania Contente‐Cuomo, … Muhammed Murtaza·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2018
- Benchmarking fragmentation-derived artificial cfDNA reference standards
Lotte Cornelli, N.N. Truong, … Katleen De Preter·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Comprehensive benchmarking of methods for mutation calling in circulating tumor DNA
Hanaé Carrié, Ngak Leng Sim, … Anders J. Skanderup·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2025
- Flexible Methods for Standard Error Calculation in digital PCR Experiments
Yao Chen, Ward De Spiegelaere, … Olivier Thas·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2023