Most High Throughput Expression Data Sets are Underpowered
Alexander J. TrostleiD, Jiasheng WangiD, Lucian LiiD, Ying‐Wooi WaniD, Zhandong LiuiD
Abstract
Researchers handicap their high-throughput sequencing experiments when they do not perform enough biological replicates. Given that biological tissues can be highly variable, too few replicates will lead to false negatives, false positives, irreproducibility, and failure to detect real biological signatures. We propose that at least six biological replicates per condition becomes the standard for high-throughput expression datasets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing Reproducibility of High-throughput Experiments in the Case of Missing Data.
Roopali Singh, Feipeng Zhang, Qunhua Li·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2022
- Probability-based methods for outlier detection in replicated high-throughput biological data
Matthew S. Smith, Karthik Devarajan·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2020
- What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments?
Stanley E. Lazic, Charlie J. Clarke-Williams, Marcus Robert Munafo·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2018
- Systematic Replication Enables Normalization of High-throughput Imaging Assays
Gregory J. Hunt, Mark A. Dane, … Johann A. Gagnon-Bartsch·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022
- A statistical framework for measuring reproducibility and replicability of high-throughput experiments from multiple sources
Monia Ranalli, Yafei Lyu, … Qunhua Li·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- AuPairWise: a method to estimate RNA-seq replicability through co-expression
Sara Ballouz, Jesse Gillis·PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2016