henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Wild-type and mutated beta-catenin differently repress RND3/RHOE expression in hepatocellular carcinoma

Sara BasbousiD, Sandra Sena, Grégoire ManaudiD, Camille DantzeriD, Véronique Neaud, Léo PiquetiD, Florence Grise, Frédéric MartinsiD, Christine VaroniD, Sabine Gerbal‐ChaloiniD, Alexandre FavereauxiD, Sabine ColnotiD, Valérie Lagrée, Clotilde BillottetiD, Violaine MoreauiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Background & AimsTumor development and progression are mainly driven by oncogenic mutations but are also regulated by physical factors, such as applied forces or microenvironment stiffness. Through its structural and transcriptional functions, {beta}catenin is a key factor that acts on both aspects to promote liver tumorigenesis, leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. However, the mechanisms by which these two functions regulate downstream targets remain poorly understood. Herein, we describe Rnd3, also called RhoE, an atypical member of the Rho GTPase family, as a common target of both functions of {beta}-catenin. We previously demonstrated that RND3 expression is downregulated in HCC, which correlates with intrahepatic metastasis. Yet, a molecular understanding of how Rnd3 expression is dysregulated in cancer is largely missing. Approach & ResultsUsing human HCC samples and cultured cell lines, we demonstrate that Rnd3 expression is regulated by {beta}-catenin pathways, regardless of their mutational status. Both the transcriptional and the structural activity of {beta}-catenin repress the expression of RND3. Indeed, we found that wild-type {beta}-catenin suppresses RND3 transcription through the Hippo pathway, whereas oncogenic {beta}-catenin downregulates RND3 expression through miRNA targeting its 3UTR. ConclusionRnd3 may constitute a key protein involved in the transcriptional program driven by oncogenic {beta}-catenin in HCC and as a mediator of the mechanosensitive response associated with cell-cell adhesion.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
top 31%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.