bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Multi-region brain transcriptomes uncover two subtypes of aging individuals with differences in Alzheimer risk and the impact of APOEe4
Annie LeeiD, Yiyi MaiD, Lei YuiD, Robert J. DaweiD, Cristin AubiniD, Konstantinos ArfanakisiD, Richard P MayeuxiD, David Alan BennettiD, Hans‐Ulrich KleiniD, Philip L. De JageriD
Abstract
The heterogeneity of the older population suggests the existence of subsets of individuals which share certain brain molecular features and respond differently to risk factors for Alzheimers disease, but this population structure remains poorly defined. Here, we performed an unsupervised clustering of individuals with multi-region brain transcriptomes to assess whether a broader approach, simultaneously considering data from multiple regions involved in cognition would uncover such subsets. We implemented a canonical correlation-based analysis in a Discovery cohort of 459 participants from two longitudinal studies of cognitive aging that have RNA sequence profiles in three brain regions. 690 additional participants that have data in only one or two of these regions were used in the Replication effort. These clustering analyses identified two meta-clusters, MC-1 and MC-2. The two sets of participants differ primarily in their trajectories of cognitive decline, with MC-2 having a delay of 3 years to the median age of incident dementia. This is due, in part, to a greater impact of tau pathology on neuronal chromatin architecture and to broader brain changes including greater loss of white matter integrity in MC-1. Further evidence of biological differences includes a significantly larger impact of APOE{varepsilon}4 risk on cognitive decline in MC-1. These findings suggest that our proposed population structure captures an aspect of the more distributed molecular state of the aging brain that either enhances the effect of risk factors in MC-1 or of protective effects in MC-2. These observations may inform the design of therapeutic development efforts and of trials as both become increasingly more targeted molecularly. One Sentence Summary: There are two types of aging brains, with one being more vulnerable to APOE{varepsilon}4 and subsequent neuronal dysfunction and cognitive loss.
- Citations
- 13
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Subtypes of brain change in aging and their associations with cognition and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers
Elettra Capogna, Øystein Sørensen, … Dídac Vidal-piñeiro A·Neurobiology of AgingPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024
- Transcriptomic changes highly similar to Alzheimer's disease are observed in a subpopulation of individuals during normal brain aging
Shouneng Peng, Lu Zeng, … Zhidong Tu·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2021
- Human brain aging heterogeneity observed from multi-region omics data reveals a subtype closely related to Alzheimer's disease
Shouneng Peng, Erming Wang, … Zhidong Tu·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2024
- Genetic Substrates of Brain Vulnerability and Resilience in Aging APOE2 Mice
Ali Mahzarnia, Hae Sol Moon, … Alexandra Badea·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2022
- Vulnerability to memory decline in aging. A mega-analysis of structural brain change.
Dídac Vidal-piñeiro A, Øystein Sørensen, … Anders M. Fjell·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2025
- APOE ε4 effects on hippocampal atrophy in the healthy elderly reflect future cognitive decline
Linda Zhang, Miguel Calero, … Bryan Andrew Strange·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2022