bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
Physical continuity at biomaterial-ECM interfaces regulates fibroblast activation via NF-κB
Alejandra Suarez‐ArnedoiD, Michaela Harris, Calista Robinson, Lindsay RileyiD, Amy KimiD, Lucy ZhangiD, Brenton D. HoffmaniD, Tatiana SeguraiD
Abstract
Fibrotic responses at biomaterial-tissue interfaces limit implant integration and regenerative healing, yet how the interaction between biomaterials and the extracellular matrix (ECM) regulates fibroblast activation remains poorly understood. Granular hydrogels including microporous annealed particle scaffolds (MAP) reduce fibrosis, while chemically and mechanically matched hydrogels do not, suggesting a dominant role for scaffold architecture. In this model, MAP scaffolds allow collagen infiltration and form physically continuous composites, whereas hydrogels exclude collagen and generate interfacial slip planes. To isolate how biomaterial architecture influences extracellular matrix (ECM) integration and fibroblast activation, we developed a reductionist in vitro model that integrates collagen type I with either microporous annealed particle (MAP) scaffolds or chemically and mechanically matched bulk hydrogels. This physical integration stabilizes collagen architecture, limits fibroblast-mediated matrix compaction, suppresses contractility, and attenuates myofibroblast transition. Fibroblasts in mechanically integrated environments exhibit reduced expression and nuclear localization of NF-{kappa}B and are enriched for quiescent phenotypes. Together, these findings identify biomaterial-ECM physical continuity as a design principle for limiting fibrotic signaling.
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The combined influence of viscoelastic and adhesive cues on fibroblast spreading and focal adhesion formation
E. Hui, L. Moretti, … S. R. Caliari·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2021
- Direct M2 macrophage co-culture overrides viscoelastic hydrogel mechanics to promote fibroblast activation
Leilani R. Astrab, Mackenzie L. Skelton, Steven R. Caliari·Cell BiomaterialsPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2025
- A unique Thy-1-negative immuno-fibroblast population emerges as a key determinant of fibrotic outcomes to biomaterials
D. Abebayehu, B. N. Pfaff, … T. Barker·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2022
- An extracellular matrix coating similar to articular cartilage inhibits the differentiation of myofibroblasts and limits the development of implant-induced fibrosis
Melis Ozkan, Michael J. V. White, … Jeffrey A. Hubbell·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2025
- Adhesive implant interfaces prevent fibrosis by disrupting mechanobiological feedback
Mohammad Jafari, Bastien F.G. Aymon, … Farid Alisafaei·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2025
- Fibroblast alignment is governed by stiffness interfaces in hydrogels.
R. J. B. Dijkstra, Janette Kay Burgess, … Martin C. Harmsen·Cell Reports Physical SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026