Microbiology SpectrumMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
The selective culture and enrichment of major rumen bacteria on three distinct anaerobic culture media
Alice M. BuckneriD, Laura GlendinningiD, Juan Manuel Palma‐HidalgoiD, Jolanda M. van MunsteriD, Mark P. StevensiD, Mick WatsoniD, C. J. NewboldiD
Abstract
Ruminants play an important part in global food security, but also emit methane which contributes to global warming. Microbes in the rumen strongly influence the energy retention efficiency from the hosts plant-based diet and produce methane as a by-product. While thousands of novel microbial genomes have been assembled from metagenome sequence data, their culturability is ill-defined. Here different media were used to isolate microbes from rumen fluid. 34 genera were grown, and the majority belonged to the phylum Bacillota (75.28% {+/-} 6.34), Bacteroidota (19.99% {+/-} 4.85), Pseudomonadota (2.46% {+/-} 2.01), and Actinomycetota (2.09% {+/-} 1.07). The most abundant genera were Selenomonas (28.08% {+/-} 11.71), Streptococcus (22.67% {+/-} 6.06), Prevotella (18.71% {+/-} 4.02), and unclassified Lachnospiraceae (11.50% {+/-} 2.54). When comparing the mean relative abundance of these genera between media, 31 were significantly enriched on at least one medium. The composition of the source rumen fluid was vastly different to those cultured. Bacteroidota (52.53% {+/-} 5.10) predominated, with by Bacillota (41.00% {+/-} 3.96), the archaeal Euryarchaeota (5.12% {+/-} 1.94), Pseudomonadota (1.22% {+/-} 0.78), and Actinomycetota (0.12% {+/-} 0.08) comprising the rest. The most abundant genera were Prevotella (29.13% {+/-} 4.16), Butyrivibrio (18.21% {+/-} 2.08), Succiniclasticum (15.57% {+/-} 5.03), unclassified Bacteroidetes (13.91% {+/-} 1.67), and unclassified Prevotellaceae (9.50% {+/-} 2.01). These data further emphasise the importance of using defined media to selectively enrich for different microbial taxa. This is essential to understand the complex workings of the rumen microbes to enhance digestion efficiency and reduce the loss of energy as methane.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Illumina sequencing analysis of the ruminal microbiota in high-yield and low-yield lactating dairy cows
- Methanogenesis inhibition remodels microbial fermentation and stimulates acetogenesis in ruminants
Gaofeng Ni, Min Wang, … Chris Greening·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2025
- Effect of different forage-to-concentrate ratios on the structure of rumen bacteria and its relationship with nutrition levels and real-time methane production in sheep
- Ruminosignatures associated with methane emissions and feed efficiency across geographies and cattle breeds
Ioanna‐Theoni Vourlaki, Ori Furman, … Yuliaxis Ramayo‐Caldas·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Alternative hydrogen uptake pathways suppress methane production in ruminants
Chris Greening, Renae Geier, … Roderick I. Mackie·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2018
- The Rumen Metatranscriptome Landscape Reflects Dietary Adaptation and Methanogenesis in Lactating Dairy Cows
Bastian Hornung, Bartholomeus van den Bogert, … Hauke Smidt·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2018