Sign in
Molecular BiologyNucleic Acids Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Molecular Structure and DNA Binding Mode of Unsymmetric Cyanine Dyes RiboGreen and OliGreen

Nolan BlackfordiD, Saileena NepaliD, Lianqing ZhengiD, Wei Yuan YangiD, Robert SilversiD

Abstract

The binding of fluorescent dyes to nucleic acids and their fluorogenic properties are indispensable tools for nucleic acid detection, quantification, and imaging, yet the molecular structures of several widely used commercial dyes have remained unknown. Here, we de novo determined the molecular structures of RiboGreen and OliGreen and confirmed the previously proposed structure of PicoGreen using high-field NMR spectroscopy and ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. All three dyes were identified as unsymmetric cyanine dyes, where benzazolium and 4-quinolinium moieties are linked by a monomethine bridge. Complete 1H and 13C resonance assignments enabled us to expand the existing chemical shift reference set for this important class of dyes. Photophysical characterization with standardized single- and double-stranded DNA and RNA targets indicated that all dyes performed similarly upon binding despite being marketed towards different nucleic acid types. NMR spectroscopy and long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations showed that RiboGreen interacts with double-stranded DNA predominantly by two binding modes, electrostatic interactions with the phosphodiester backbone and {pi}-{pi} stacking with accessible nucleobases of the DNA molecule. These results establish the molecular structures of three widely used commercial dyes and provide a structural and mechanistic framework for understanding the fluorogenic properties of this class of dyes. HighlightsO_LIDetermination of the molecular structures of nucleic acid dyes RiboGreen, OliGreen, and PicoGreen C_LIO_LINMR spectroscopic characterization of all three dyes. C_LIO_LINMR and MD data indicate binding to be dominated by electrostatic and {pi}-{pi} stacking interactions C_LI

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
24th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.