Modeling methyl-sensitive transcription factor motifs with an expanded epigenetic alphabet
Coby VineriD, Charles A. IshakiD, James JohnsoniD, Nicolas J. WalkeriD, Hui ShiiD, Marcela K. Sjöberg-HerreraiD, Shu Yi SheniD, Santana M. LardoiD, David J. AdamsiD, Anne C. Ferguson‐SmithiD, Daniel Diniz De CarvalhoiD, Sarah J. HaineriD, Timothy L. BaileyiD, Michael M. HoffmaniD
Abstract
Transcription factors bind DNA in specific sequence contexts. In addition to distinguishing one nucleobase from another, some transcription factors can distinguish between unmodified and modified bases. Current models of transcription factor binding tend not take DNA modifications into account, while the recent few that do often have limitations. This makes a comprehensive and accurate profiling of transcription factor affinities difficult. Here, we developed methods to identify transcription factor binding sites in modified DNA. Our models expand the standard A/C/G/T DNA alphabet to include cytosine modifications. We developed Cytomod to create modified genomic sequences and enhanced the Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME) Suite by adding the capacity to handle custom alphabets. We adapted the well-established position weight matrix (PWM) model of transcription factor binding affinity to this expanded DNA alphabet. Using these methods, we identified modification-sensitive transcription factor binding motifs. We confirmed established binding preferences, such as the preference of ZFP57 and C/EBP{beta} for methylated motifs and the preference of c-Myc for unmethylated E-box motifs. Using known binding preferences to tune model parameters, we discovered novel modified motifs for a wide array of transcription factors. Finally, we validated predicted binding preferences of OCT4 using cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT&RUN) experiments across conventional, methylation-, and hydroxymethylation-enriched sequences. Our approach readily extends to other DNA modifications. As more genome-wide single-base resolution modification data becomes available, we expect that our method will yield insights into altered transcription factor binding affinities across many different modifications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Finding de novo methylated DNA motifs
Vu Ngo, Mengchi Wang, Wei Ting Wang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2019
- Using methylation data to improve transcription factor binding prediction
Daniel C. Morgan, Dawn Lisa DeMeo, Kimberly Glass·EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2024
- Identification of methylation-sensitive human transcription factors using meSMiLE-seq
Antoni J. Gralak, Kateřina Faltejsková, … Bart Deplancke·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2026
- Widespread effects of DNA methylation and intra-motif dependencies revealed by novel transcription factor binding models
Jan Grau, Florian Schmidt, Marcel H. Schulz·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- SEMplMe: A tool for integrating DNA methylation effects in transcription factor binding affinity predictions
Sierra S. Nishizaki, Alan P. Boyle·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2022
- A base-resolution panorama of the in vivo impact of cytosine methylation on transcription factor binding
Aldo Hernández-Corchado, Hamed Shateri Najafabadi·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2022