Effects of High-Volume versus High-Load Resistance Training on Skeletal Muscle Growth and Molecular Adaptations

Abstract

AimWe evaluated the effects of higher-load (HL) versus (lower-load) higher-volume (HV) resistance training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy, strength, and muscle-level molecular markers. MethodsTrained men (n=15, age: 23{+/-}3 y; training experience: 7{+/-}3 y) performed unilateral lower body training for 6 weeks (3x weekly), where single legs were assigned to HV and HL paradigms. Vastus lateralis (VL) biopsies were obtained prior to study initiation (PRE) as well as 3 days (POST) and 10 days following the last bout (POSTPR). Body composition and strength tests were performed at each testing session, and biochemical assays were performed on muscle tissue after study completion. Two-way within subjects repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on all dependent variables except tracer data, which was compared using dependent samples t-tests. ResultsA significant (p<0.05) interaction existed for unilateral leg extension 1RM (HV<HL at POST and POSTPR). Six-week integrated sarcoplasmic protein synthesis (iSarcoPS) rates were higher in the HV versus HL leg, while no difference between legs existed for integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. Main time effects existed for unilateral leg press strength (PRE<POST and POSTPR), knee extensor peak torque (PRE and POST<POSTPR), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived upper leg lean mass (PRE<POST and POSTPR), ultrasound-derived VL thickness (PRE and POSTPR<POST), sarcoplasmic protein concentrations (POST and POSTPR<PRE), and tropomyosin and troponin protein abundances (POST and POSTPR<PRE). ConclusionsWith the exception of differences in leg extensor strength and iSarcoPS between legs, our data suggest that short-term (6 weeks) HV and HL training elicit similar hypertrophic, strength, and molecular-level adaptations.