Deep metabolic profiling assessment of tissue extraction protocols for three model organisms
H. M. Gegner, N. Mechtel, E. Heidenreich, A. Wirth, F. G. Cortizo, K. Bennewitz, T. Fleming, C. Andresen, M. Freichel, A. A. Teleman, J. Kroll, R. Hell, G. Poschet
Abstract
Metabolic profiling harbors the potential to better understand various disease entities such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimers, Parkinsons disease or COVID-19. Deciphering these intricate pathways in human studies requires large sample sizes as a means of reducing variability. While such broad human studies have discovered new associations between a given disease and certain affected metabolites, i.e. biomarkers, they often provide limited functional insights. To design more standardized experiments, reduce variability in the measurements and better resolve the functional component of such dynamic metabolic profiles, model organisms are frequently used. Standardized rearing conditions and uniform sampling strategies are prerequisites towards a successful metabolomic study. However, further aspects such as the choice of extraction protocol and analytical technique can influence the outcome drastically. Here, we employed a highly standardized metabolic profiling assay analyzing 630 metabolites across three commonly used model organisms (Drosophila, mouse and Zebrafish) to find the optimal extraction protocols for various matrices. Focusing on parameters such as metabolite coverage, metabolite yield and variance between replicates we compared seven extraction protocols. We found that the application of a combination of 75% ethanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), while not producing the broadest coverage and highest yields, was the most reproducible extraction protocol. We were able to determine up to 530 metabolites in mouse kidney samples, 509 in mouse liver, 422 in Zebrafish and 388 in Drosophila and discovered a core overlap of 261 metabolites in these four matrices. To enable other scientists to search for the most suitable extraction protocol in their experimental context and interact with this comprehensive data, we have integrated our data set in the open-source shiny app "MetaboExtract". This will enable scientists to search for their metabolite or metabolite class of interest, compare it across the different tested extraction protocols and sample types as well as find reference concentrations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics
C. Andresen, T. Boch, … D. Huebschmann·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2021
- An automated metabolite extraction workflow for global metabolomics analysis using the Agilent Bravo liquid handling platform
Fraser Massie, Andrew MacKenzie, … Tessa Moses·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2025
- Evaluation of extraction solvents for untargeted metabolomics analysis of enrichment reactor cultures performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR)
Nay Min Min Thaw Saw, Pipob Suwanchaikasem, … Rohan B. H. Williams·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2019
- Human untargeted metabolomics in the gut microbiome era: ethanol vs methanol
Simone Zuffa, Vincent Charron‐Lamoureux, … Pieter C. Dorrestein·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2025
- metaboprep: an R package for pre-analysis data description and processing.
David A. Hughes, Kurt Taylor, … Laura J. Corbin·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2022
- Screening of leaf extraction and storage conditions for eco-metabolomics studies
Jakob Lang, Sergio E. Ramos, … Meredith C. Schuman·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2023