bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Integrating Mutation and Stop Signals for Improved RNA Structure Analysis and Insight Discovery
Tong ZhouiD, Ruobin Zhao, Shaozhen Yin, Yifan HongiD, Junhao WangiD, Xitong LiuiD, Qiuzhen CheniD, Yuancheng WangiD, Chang LiuiD, Lei SuniD
Abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding RNA structures is essential for exploring its diverse cellular roles. Chemical modification-based RNA structure probing remains a key approach to revealing RNA structures in complex in vivo conditions. Practically, chemical modifications generate both mutation and stop signals during reverse transcription within a single experiment. However, traditional analysis pipelines often rely on only one of the two signals without fully leveraging both. ResultsTo address this, we developed a machine learning-based approach, STONE, that integrates both signals from a single experiment. STONE improved RNA structure analysis across multiple independent validation regions, notably 28S rRNA, viral RNA and regulatory RNAs. In genome-wide datasets, especially single-cell data, STONE significantly increased nucleotide coverage per transcript and improved gene detection reliability. In genome-wide datasets, especially single-cell data, STONE substantially enhanced structural information coverage at both transcript and nucleotide levels. This maximized signal utilization, yielding RNA structures in single-cell data comparable to those from bulk datasets. Furthermore, STONE-derived structural scores allow direct identification of RNA-binding protein binding sites directly from a single probing experiment, with results on RNAs such as U1 snRNA, RNase P RNA, and XIST lncRNA closely matching established techniques like CLIP-seq and RNP-MaP. ConclusionsBy integrating mutation and stop signals from one single experiment, STONE advances RNA structure analysis accuracy, extends nucleotide coverage, and facilitates complex RNA-protein interaction studies, broadening the methods applications in RNA-based research.
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- STRUCT: a statistical approach to identify RNA secondary structures from raw sequencing data, bypassing multiple sequence alignment
Julie Fangran Wang, Arjun Rustagi, Julia Salzman·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2024
- Best practices for genome-wide RNA structure analysis: combination of mutational profiles and drop-off information
Eva Maria Novoa, Jean-Denis Beaudoin, … M Kellis·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2020
- RNA structure inference through chemical mapping after accidental or intentional mutations
C. Cheng, W. Kladwang, … R. Das·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2017
- Single molecule structure sequencing reveals RNA structural dependencies, breathing and ensembles
Teshome Tilahun Bizuayehu, Kornel Labun, … Eivind Valen·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2022
- Correcting a SHAPE-directed RNA structure by a mutate-map-rescue approach
Siqi Tian, Pablo Cordero, … Rhiju Das·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2014
- Differential BUM-HMM: a robust statistical modelling approach for detecting RNA flexibility changes in high-throughput structure probing data
Paolo Marangio, Ka Ying Toby Law, … Sander Granneman·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2021