henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

Integrating Mutation and Stop Signals for Improved RNA Structure Analysis and Insight Discovery

Tong ZhouiD, Ruobin Zhao, Shaozhen Yin, Yifan HongiD, Junhao WangiD, Xitong LiuiD, Qiuzhen CheniD, Yuancheng WangiD, Chang LiuiD, Lei SuniD

PDFDOI

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding RNA structures is essential for exploring its diverse cellular roles. Chemical modification-based RNA structure probing remains a key approach to revealing RNA structures in complex in vivo conditions. Practically, chemical modifications generate both mutation and stop signals during reverse transcription within a single experiment. However, traditional analysis pipelines often rely on only one of the two signals without fully leveraging both. ResultsTo address this, we developed a machine learning-based approach, STONE, that integrates both signals from a single experiment. STONE improved RNA structure analysis across multiple independent validation regions, notably 28S rRNA, viral RNA and regulatory RNAs. In genome-wide datasets, especially single-cell data, STONE significantly increased nucleotide coverage per transcript and improved gene detection reliability. In genome-wide datasets, especially single-cell data, STONE substantially enhanced structural information coverage at both transcript and nucleotide levels. This maximized signal utilization, yielding RNA structures in single-cell data comparable to those from bulk datasets. Furthermore, STONE-derived structural scores allow direct identification of RNA-binding protein binding sites directly from a single probing experiment, with results on RNAs such as U1 snRNA, RNase P RNA, and XIST lncRNA closely matching established techniques like CLIP-seq and RNP-MaP. ConclusionsBy integrating mutation and stop signals from one single experiment, STONE advances RNA structure analysis accuracy, extends nucleotide coverage, and facilitates complex RNA-protein interaction studies, broadening the methods applications in RNA-based research.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '24Novoa '20Cheng '17Bizuayehu '22Tian '14Marangio '21
62% semantic matchGenomics