BMC BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Accurate calling of low-frequency somatic mutations by sample-specific modeling of error rates
Yixin LiniD, Carmen OroperviD, Peter Soerud PorsborgiD, Amanda FrydendahliD, Mads Heilskov RasmusseniD, Thomas M BatailloniD, Mikkel Heide SchierupiD, Claus L. AnderseniD, Kristian AlmstrupiD, Søren BesenbacheriD
Abstract
Calling rare somatic variants from NGS data is more challenging than calling inherited variants, especially if the somatic variant is only present in a small fraction of the cells in the sequenced biopsy. In this case, having a good estimate of the error rate of a specific base in a particular read becomes essential. In paired-end sequencing, where some DNA fragments are shorter than twice the read length, the overlapping regions of the read pairs are an ideal resource for training models to discern context-dependent base error rates, as any discordant bases in the overlaps must be caused by a sequencing error or an alignment error. We have created a new tool named BBQ (an acronym for Better Base Quality) that uses overlapping reads to estimate the error rate conditional on the mutation type, sequence context, and base quality. We also estimate how much the error rate of concordant bases in overlapping reads is decreased compared to bases in non-overlapping reads. Results show that overlapping reads can remove sequencing errors induced by DNA damage and that the increased quality of overlapping reads differs between samples and mutation types, reflecting different damage patterns between samples. We use the error models to call rare somatic variants. Sequencing data from a testis biopsy and a cell-free DNA sample serve as a proof-of-concept for rare germ cell mutation calling and for detecting rare cancer mutations. We find that using the sample-specific error models of BBQ allows us to call rare somatic variants with fewer false positives than existing tools such as Mutect2 and Strelka2.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA damage is a major cause of sequencing errors, directly confounding variant identification.
Lixin Chen, Pingfang Liu, … Laurence Michele Ettwiller·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2016
- Needlestack: an ultra-sensitive variant caller for multi-sample next generation sequencing data
Tiffany Myriam Delhomme, Patrice Hodonou Avogbe, … Matthieu Foll·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020
- smCounter2: an accurate low-frequency variant caller for targeted sequencing data with unique molecular identifiers
Chang Xu, Xiujing Gu, … Yexun Wang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2018
- Improved Mutation Detection in Duplex Sequencing Data with Sample-Specific Error Profiles
Yuhe Cheng, Shuvro Prokash Nandi, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2025
- UMI-Gen: a UMI-based reads simulator for variant calling evaluation in paired-end sequencing NGS libraries
Vincent Sater, Pierre‐Julien Viailly, … Fabrice Jardin·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- SafeMut: UMI-aware variant simulator incorporating allele-fraction overdispersion in read editing
Xiaofei Zhao, Jingyu Guo, Sizhen Wang·Informatics in Medicine UnlockedPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023