Common variants in Alzheimer's disease: Novel association of six genetic variants with AD and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores
Itziar de RojasiD, Sonia Moreno–GrauiD, Niccoló TesiiD, Benjamin Grenier‐BoleyiD, Víctor AndradeiD, Iris E. JanseniD, Nancy L. PederseniD, Najada StringaiD, Anna ZettergreniD, Isabel HernándeziD, Laura MontrrealiD, Carmen AntúneziD, Anna AntonelliD, Rick M. TankardiD, Joshua C. BisiD, Rebecca SimsiD, Céline BellengueziD, Inés QuintelaiD, Antonio González-Pérez, Miguel CaleroiD, Emilio Franco, Juan Macı́asiD, Rafael BlesaiD, Manuel Menéndez‐GonzáleziD, Ana FrankiD, , Agustı́n RuiziD
Abstract
BACKGROUNDDisentangling the genetic constellation underlying Alzheimers disease (AD) is important. Doing so allows us to identify biological pathways underlying AD, point towards novel drug targets and use the variants for individualised risk predictions in disease modifying or prevention trials. In the present work we report on the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) for AD risk to date and show the combined utility of proven AD loci for precision medicine using polygenic risk scores (PRS). METHODSThree sets of summary statistics were included in our meta-GWAS of AD: an Spanish case-control study (GR@ACE/DEGESCO study, n = 12,386), the case-control study of International Genomics of Alzheimer project (IGAP, n = 82,771) and the UK Biobank (UKB) AD-by-proxy case-control study (n=314,278). Using these resources, we performed a fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. Detected loci were confirmed in a replication study of 19,089 AD cases and 39,101 controls from 16 European-ancestry cohorts not previously used. We constructed a weighted PRS based on the 39 AD variants. PRS were generated by multiplying the genotype dosage of each risk allele for each variant by its respective weight, and then summing across all variants. We first validated it for AD in independent data (assessing effects of sub-threshold signal, diagnostic certainty, age at onset and sex) and tested its effect on risk (odds for disease) and age at onset in the GR@ACE/DEGESCO study. FINDINGSUsing our meta-GWAS approach and follow-up analysis, we identified novel genome-wide significant associations of six genetic variants with AD risk (rs72835061-CHRNE, rs2154481-APP, rs876461-PRKD3/NDUFAF7, rs3935877-PLCG2 and two missense variants: rs34173062/rs34674752 in SHARPIN gene) and confirmed a stop codon mutation in the IL34 gene increasing the risk of AD (IL34-Tyr213Ter), and two other variants in PLCG2 and HS3ST1 regions. This brings the total number of genetic variants associated with AD to 39 (excluding APOE). The PRS based on these variants was associated with AD in an independent clinical AD-case control dataset (OR=1.30, per 1-SD increase in the PRS, 95%CI 1.18-1.44, p = 1.1x10-7), a similar effect to that in the GR@ACE/DEGESCO (OR=1.27, 95%CI 1.23-1.32, p = 7.4x10-39). We then explored the combined effects of these 39 variants in a PRS for AD risk and age-at-onset stratification in GR@ACE/DEGESCO. Excluding APOE, we observed a gradual risk increase over the 2% tiles; when comparing the extremes, those with the 2% highest risk had a 2.98-fold (95% CI 2.12-4.18, p = 3.2x10-10) increased risk compared to those with the 2% lowest risk (p = 5.9x10-10). Using the PRS we identified APOE {varepsilon}33 carriers with a similar risk as APOE {varepsilon}4 heterozygotes carriers, as well as APOE {varepsilon}4 heterozygote carriers with a similar risk as APOE {varepsilon}4 homozygote. Considering age at onset; there was a 9-year difference between median onset of AD the lowest risk group and the highest risk group (82 vs 73 years; p = 1.6x10-6); a 4-year median onset difference (81 vs 77 years; p = 6.9x10-5) within APOE {varepsilon}4 heterozygotes and a 5.5-year median onset difference (78.5 vs 73 years; p = 4.6x10-5) within APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers. INTERPRETATIONWe identified six novel genetic variants associated with AD-risk, among which one common APP variant. A PRS of all genetic loci reported to date could be a robust tool to predict the risk and age at onset of AD, beyond APOE alone. These properties make PRS instrumental in selecting individuals at risk in order to apply preventative strategies and might have potential use in diagnostic work-up.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 28
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rare extreme polygenic risk scores strongly indicate Alzheimer's disease risk
Elizabeth L. Ward, Peter T. Nelson, … Justin B. Miller·medRxiv·Sep 9, 2026
- Cross-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores Enhance Alzheimer's Disease Risk Prediction in Multiethnic Cohorts
Michael C Okorie, Caroline Jonson, … for the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project and the Healthy Aging Brain Study—Health Disparities·Alzheimer s & DementiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 28, 2026
- Polygenic risk score analysis identifies deleterious protein-coding variants in novel immune pathway genes ATP8B4, FCGR1A, and LILRB1 that associate with Alzheimer's disease.
Joseph S. Reddy, Xue Wang, … Steven G. Younkin·medRxiv·Jul 12, 2022
- A multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer disease is associated with cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations
Nuzulul Kurniansyah, Shinya Tasaki, … Lindsay A. Farrer·medRxiv·Sep 24, 2025
- Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Families with Exceptional Longevity
Laura Xicota, Rong Cheng, … Joseph Hyungwoo Lee·medRxiv·Jul 21, 2025
- Alzheimer's Polygenic Risk Scores Are Not Interchangeable: Evidence from 1,752 Models
Elizabeth L. Ward, Peter T. Nelson, … Justin B. Miller·medRxiv·Sep 7, 2026