VCBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Single-Cell Foundation Models
Lukas WeideneriD, Marko Brkić, Mihailo Jovanović, Emre Ulgac, Aakaash Meduri
Abstract
Single-cell foundation models are increasingly positioned as virtual cells, yet their capabilities are assessed by fragmented, largely single-task benchmarks that obscure where these models improve on simple baselines. VCBench addresses this by synthesizing four independent virtual-cell frameworks into seven capability dimensions: perturbation response prediction, cross-species universality, gene regulatory network (GRN) inference, modality integration, temporal dynamics, multi-scale integration, and in silico experimentation. Each dimension is assessed for operational testability under current architectures and datasets: five admit direct or proxy evaluation, while multi-scale integration and in silico experimentation are structurally untestable as end-to-end tasks. We evaluate five foundation models (Geneformer, scGPT, UCE, TranscriptFormer, Arc State) against pre-registered linear and nearest-neighbor baselines across the five testable dimensions, and report three findings. First, the baselines match or exceed every foundation model on four of the five scored dimensions, replicating the reported competitiveness of linear baselines on perturbation prediction and extending it to cross-species transfer, GRN inference, and temporal ordering. Second, TranscriptFormer alone exceeds the strongest baseline on cross-modal RNA-to-protein prediction (53% Pearson improvement, with a documented contamination caveat) and is the only model to reach Level 2 in the pre-registered Virtual Cell (VC) Level rubric; the architectural choice behind this advantage simultaneously causes a spectral collapse that destroys its temporal-ordering performance, a tradeoff invisible to single-task benchmarks. Third, no foundation model publishes a complete cell-level training manifest, leaving data contamination undetectable to users. Alongside the benchmark, VCBench releases a Contamination Reporting Schema and contributes two further methodological tools: a common-label-set protocol that controls for class-count confounds in cross-species transfer, and a spread-error correlation probe for epistemic calibration.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond the Final Layer: Evaluating Single-Cell Foundation Model Representations for Molecular Prediction
Ming-Ching Crystal Wen, Yiwei Lyu, Andrew Robbins·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- Where single-cell foundation models help: a benchmark of annotation, perturbation and regulatory inference against simple baselines
Francesca Anna Cupaioli, Ivan Merelli·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Benchmarking single-cell foundation models in a zero-shot setting
Yasmine Gaballa, Somaia Ahmed, Tamim Abdelaal·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- SCALE: Scalable Conditional Atlas-Level Endpoint transport for virtual cell perturbation prediction
Shuizhou Chen, Lang Yu, … Zhangyang Gao·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- CellOS: Learning a World Model of Cellular State through Joint Embedding Prediction
- Benchmarking single-cell foundation models for real-world RNA-seq data integration
Siyu Han, Tamas Ryszard Sztanka-Toth, … Alex Javidi·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2026