Sign in
MicrobiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Evaluating metagenomic analyses for undercharacterized environments: what's needed to light up the microbial dark matter?

William A. NickolsiD, Lauren J. McIveriD, Aaron M. WalshiD, Yancong ZhangiD, Jacob T. NearingiD, Francesco AsnicariD, Michal PunčochářiD, Nicola SegataiD, Long H. NguyeniD, Erica Marie HartmanniD, Eric A. FranzosaiD, Curtis HuttenhoweriD, Kelsey N. ThompsoniD

Abstract

Non-human-associated microbial communities play important biological roles, but they remain less understood than human-associated communities. Here, we assess the impact of key environmental sample properties on a variety of state-of-the-art metagenomic analysis methods. In simulated datasets, all methods performed similarly at high taxonomic ranks, but newer marker-based methods incorporating metagenomic assembled genomes outperformed others at lower taxonomic levels. In real environmental data, taxonomic profiles assigned to the same sample by different methods showed little agreement at lower taxonomic levels, but the methods agreed better on community diversity estimates and estimates of the relationships between environmental parameters and microbial profiles.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMolik '18Piro '17Sun '21Woodcroft '25Ruscheweyh '21Pearman '20
70% semantic matchBioinformatics
David C. Molik, Michael E. Pfrender, Scott Emrich·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2018· 3 citations