medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Clustering of major depressive disorder genetic instruments identifies distinct and directionally opposing effects on cardiometabolic risk
Dale HandleyiD, Renu BalaiD, Francesco CasanovaiD, Alexandra C. GillettiD, Chris Wai Hang LoiD, Madhurbain SinghiD, Inês BarrosoiD, Jack BowdeniD, Cathryn M. LewisiD, Jessica TyrrelliD
Abstract
BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous condition that is frequently co-morbid with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and yet the biological mechanisms linking these diseases remain unclear. We aim to identify distinct biological pathways in depression that may modify T2D risk. MethodsUsing Clustered Mendelian randomisation (MR-Clust), we analysed 621 genome-wide significant MDD variants to identify clusters of variants with similar causal effects on T2D. These clusters were validated, and their causal effects were comprehensively tested against glycaemic traits, depression subtypes, T2D risk factors, and cardiometabolic biomarkers using external GWAS data and the UK Biobank. Functional annotation of these clusters was performed using FUMA. ResultsMR-Clust identified three distinct clusters of MDD-associated variants. Two clusters (MDD1 and MDD2) were causal for higher T2D and its related risk factors, adverse glycaemic and cardiometabolic profiles. Functional annotation implicated brain expression that overlapped strongly with depression-related traits such as smoking and neuroticism. By contrast, MDD3 was causal for lower T2D risk, more favourable glycaemic and cardiometabolic biomarker profiles, and was enriched for gene sets linked to fatty acid metabolism and steroid biosynthesis. MDD1 and MDD2 clusters were associated with atypical-like depression symptoms, whereas MDD3 was associated with melancholic depression symptoms. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate a heterogenous genetic architecture for depression, with distinct biological pathways conferring opposing effects on cardiometabolic health. Understanding this heterogeneity could help tailor prevention and treatment strategies for people with depression at greatest metabolic risk.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic comorbidity between major depression and cardio-metabolic disease, stratified by age at onset of major depression.
Saskia P. Hagenaars, JRI Coleman, … Cathryn M. Lewis·bioRxiv·May 24, 2019
- Dissecting Pleiotropy Between Major Depressive Disorder and Physical Disease Comorbidities
Damian J. Woodward, William R. Reay, … Eske M. Derks·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026
- Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression
eQTLGen, Naomi R. Wray, … Niamh Mullins·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2018
- Differential associations of various depression-related phenotypes with cardiometabolic risks: Identification of shared genetic factors and implications for drug repositioning
Brian Chi‐Fung Wong, Carlos Kwan‐Long Chau, … Hon‐Cheong So·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2017
- Role of Blood Lipids in the Shared Genetic Etiology Between Major Depressive Disorder and Myocardial Infarction: A Large-scale Multi-trait Association Analysis
Yanchen Zhu, Zhengbo Wu, … Jiqiang Hu·medRxiv·Apr 8, 2024
- The genetic overlap between mood disorders and cardio-metabolic diseases: A systematic review of genome wide and candidate gene studies
Azmeraw T. Amare, Klaus Oliver Schubert, … Bernhard Theodor Baune·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2017