henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of ElectrocardiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Interpretable machine learning of action potential duration restitution kinetics in single-cell models of atrial cardiomyocytes

Jun-Seop SongiD, Young-Seon LeeiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Action potential duration (APD) restitution curve and its maximal slope (Smax) reflect single cell-level dynamic instability for inducing chaotic heart rhythms. However, conventional parameter sensitivity analysis often fails to describe nonlinear relationships between ion channel parameters and electrophysiological phenotypes, such as Smax. We explored the parameter-phenotype mapping in a population of 5,000 single-cell atrial cell models through interpretable machine learning (ML) approaches. Parameter sensitivity analyses could explain the linear relationships between parameters and electrophysiological phenotypes, including APD90, resting membrane potential, Vmax, refractory period, and APD/calcium alternans threshold, but not for Smax. However, neural network models had better prediction performance for Smax. To interpret the ML model, we evaluated the parameter importance at the global and local levels by computing the permutation feature importance and the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) values, respectively. Increases in ICaL, INCX, and IKr, and decreases in IK1, Ib,Cl, IKur, ISERCA, and Ito are correlated with higher Smax values. The LIME algorithm determined that INaK plays a significant role in determining Smax as well as Ito and IKur. The atrial cardiomyocyte population was hierarchically clustered into three distinct groups based on the LIME values and the single-cell simulation confirmed that perturbations in INaK resulted in different behaviors of APD restitution curves in three clusters. Our combined top-down interpretable ML and bottom-up mechanistic simulation approaches uncovered the role of INaK in heterogeneous behaviors of Smax in the atrial cardiomyocyte population.

Citations
6
FWCI
1.04
Field percentile
top 22%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPikunov '20Peris-Yague '21Huang '18Shuttlewort '25Agrawal '21Oslandsbotn '23
72% semantic matchBiophysics
A. V. Pikunov, R. A. Syunyaev, V. Steckmeister+3 more·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2020