PLoS BiologyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Disentangling sources of clock-like mutations in germline and soma
Natanael SpisakiD, Marc de ManueliD, William R. MilliganiD, Guy SellaiD, Molly PrzeworskiiD
Abstract
The rates of mutations vary across cell types. To identify causes of this variation, mutations are often decomposed into a combination of the single base substitution (SBS) "signatures" observed in germline, soma and tumors, with the idea that each signature corresponds to one or a small number of underlying mutagenic processes. Two such signatures turn out to be ubiquitous across cell types: SBS signature 1, which consists primarily of transitions at methylated CpG sites caused by spontaneous deamination, and the more diffuse SBS signature 5, which is of unknown etiology. In cancers, the number of mutations attributed to these two signatures accumulates linearly with age of diagnosis, and thus the signatures have been termed "clock-like." To better understand this clocklike behavior, we develop a mathematical model that includes DNA replication errors, unrepaired damage, and damage repaired incorrectly. We show that mutational signatures can exhibit clocklike behavior because cell divisions occur at a constant rate and/or because damage rates remain constant over time, and that these distinct sources can be teased apart by comparing cell lineages that divide at different rates. With this goal in mind, we analyze the rate of accumulation of mutations in multiple cell types, including soma as well as male and female germline. We find no detectable increase in SBS signature 1 mutations in neurons and only a very weak increase in mutations assigned to the female germline, but a significant increase with time in rapidly-dividing cells, suggesting that SBS signature 1 is driven by rounds of DNA replication occurring at a relatively fixed rate. In contrast, SBS signature 5 increases with time in all cell types, including post-mitotic ones, indicating that it accumulates independently of cell divisions; this observation points to errors in DNA repair as the key underlying mechanism. Thus, the two "clock-like" signatures observed across cell types likely have distinct origins, one set by rates of cell division, the other by damage rates.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 54
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The mutational landscape of human somatic and germline cells
Luiza Moore, Alex Cagan, … Raheleh Rahbari·Yearbook of pediatric endocrinologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2022
- Collateral mutagenesis funnels multiple sources of DNA damage into a ubiquitous mutational signature
Natanael Spisak, Marc de Manuel, Molly Przeworski·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2025
- A comprehensive atlas of somatic mutation rates and mutational signatures in normal human cells
My H. Pham, Luke M. R. Harvey, … Michael R. Stratton·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2026
- Damage and Misrepair Signatures: Compact Representations of Pan-cancer Mutational Processes
Caitlin F. Harrigan, Kieran R. Campbell, … Tyler Funnell·bioRxiv·May 29, 2025
- Cancer mutational processes vary in their association with replication timing and chromatin accessibility
Adar Yaacov, Oriya Vardi, … Shai Rosenberg·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2021
- Somatic and germline mutational processes across the tree of life
S. C. Lee, Yichen Wang, … Peter J. Campbell·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2025