Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic structural variant detection at ultra-low allele fractions
Yuwei ZhangiD, Adam C. EnglishiD, Luis F. PauliniD, Christopher M. GrochowskiiD, Surabhi MaheshwariiD, Taralynn MackiD, Michele BerselliiD, Alexander D. VeitiD, Yilei FuiD, SMAHT SV working group, Peter J. ParkiD, Fritz Joachim SedlazeckiD
Abstract
Postzygotic mosaicism gives rise to somatic structural variants (SVs) at ultra-low variant allele fractions (VAFs), which pose challenges for detection due to the high-coverage sequencing required and noise introduced by sequencing artifacts. Although somatic SV detection has been extensively studied in cancer, these studies are not directly applicable to the study of tissue mosaicism, as they rely on matched normals, target higher VAF ranges, and are enriched for different types of SVs. We present comprehensive benchmark data and best practices for non-cancer somatic SV detection. We created a synthetic mosaic sample by combining six HapMap individuals at varying proportions, generating allele fractions as low as 0.25%. This sample was sequenced to [~]2,300x total coverage using Illumina, PacBio, and Nanopore technologies across multiple sequencing centers. A high-confidence benchmark SV set containing over 21,000 pseudo-somatic insertions and deletions [≥]50bp was derived from haplotype-resolved assemblies. We evaluated 12 SV discovery pipelines and identified caller-specific strengths and sequencing platform-specific shortcomings. We find that short read-based approaches show reduced recall for insertions and repeat-associated SVs, whereas long-read sequencing achieves high accuracy throughout the genome, increasing linearly with coverage. The best algorithms sensitivity exceeded 80% for VAFs [≥]4% and 15% for VAFs of 0.5-1% with 60x coverage. The publicly available benchmarking data and comparative analysis of current methods provide a foundation for robust discovery of SV mosaicism in non-cancer tissues..
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic single-nucleotide variant and indel detection at ultra-low allele fractions using short- and long-read data
Yoo-Jin Jiny Ha, Dominika Maziec, … Peter J. Park·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2025
- A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection
Jose Espejo Valle-Inclán, Nicolle J.M. Besselink, … Edwin P. J. G. Cuppen·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Cost-effective hybrid long- and short-read sequencing enables accurate somatic structural variant detection
Runtian Gao, Tao Jiang, … Guohua Wang·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data
Tingting Gong, Vanessa M. Hayes, Eva K.F. Chan·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2020
- SAVANA: reliable analysis of somatic structural variants and copy number aberrations in clinical samples using long-read sequencing
Hillary Elrick, Carolin M. Sauer, … Isidro Cortés‐Ciriano·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2025
- Somatic Structural Variant Discovery from Tumor Specific Strings Computed Against a Draft Composite Germline Reference
Davide Cesare Monti, Simone Ciccolella, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026