The impact of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant cells and fibroblasts on treatment response
Abstract
A long-standing practice in the treatment of cancer is that of hitting hard with the maximum tolerated dose to eradicate tumors. This continuous therapy, however, selects for resistant cells, leading to the failure of the treatment. A different type of treatment strategy, adaptive therapy, has recently been shown to have a degree of success in both preclinical xenograft experiments and clinical trials. Adaptive therapy is used to maintain a tumors volume by exploiting the competition between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells with minimum effective drug doses or timed drug holidays. To further understand the role of competition in the outcomes of adaptive therapy, we developed a 2D on-lattice agent-based model. Our simulations show that the superiority of the adaptive strategy over continuous therapy depends on the local competition shaped by the spatial distribution of resistant cells. Cancer cell migration and increased carrying capacity accelerate the progression of the tumor under both types of treatments by reducing the spatial competition. Intratumor competition can also be affected by fibroblasts, which produce microenvironmental factors that promote cancer cell growth. Our simulations show that the spatial architecture of fibroblasts modulates the benefits of adaptive therapy. Finally, as a proof of concept, we simulated the outcomes of adaptive therapy in multiple metastatic sites composed of different spatial distributions of fibroblasts and drug-resistant cell populations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial structure impacts adaptive therapy by shaping intra-tumoral competition
M. A. R. Strobl, J. Gallaher, … A. Anderson·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2020
- Spatial heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics modulate time to recurrence in continuous and adaptive cancer therapies
J. A. Gallaher, P. M. Enriquez-Navas, … A. R. A. Anderson·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2017
- Impacts of competition and phenotypic plasticity on the viability of adaptive therapy
B. Vibishan, Paras Jain, … Mohit Kumar Jolly·Mathematical BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Turnover modulates the need for a cost of resistance in adaptive therapy
M. A. R. Strobl, J. West, … A. Anderson·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2020
- Adaptive therapy in cancer: the role of restrictions in the accumulation of mutations
David Fontaneda, Ramón Díaz‐Uriarte·bioRxiv·May 18, 2023
- Modifying adaptive therapy to enhance competitive suppression
E. Hansen, A. F. Read·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2020