henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint

Protein Frustration Reveals Active Sites in Co-Evolved GPCR:G Protein Complexes and in Engineered Targeted Degrader Complexes

Wenyuan WeiiD, Roland Del MundoiD, Tianyi YangiD, Elizaveta MukhalevaiD, Indira R. Sivaraj, Veerabahu ShanmugasundaramiD, Sergio BranciamoreiD, Andréi S. RodiniD, Sivaraj SivaramakrishnaniD, Ning MaiD, Nagarajan VaidehiiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

The folded structure of a protein is understood to be an optimal energy state. However, previous studies have shown that certain amino acid residue positions that play a critical role in protein function are often in a suboptimal energy state or "frustrated". Here, we leverage over 1200 three-dimensional structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to demonstrate that residues at the interface between GPCR and its ligand or G protein contain a higher density of frustrated residues compared to other structural regions in the receptor. Likewise, the G subunit of the trimeric G proteins shows multiple clusters of highly frustrated residues on its surface that overlap with their effector protein (G{beta}{gamma}, RGS, Adenyl cyclase, Ric8) binding interfaces. Compared to the co-evolved GPCR:G protein complexes, engineered protein complexes, such as those facilitated by molecular degraders, show a much greater density of highly frustrated residues in the degrader interface. Our study highlights the use of protein frustration as an invaluable tool to evaluate both native protein-protein interfaces and design strategies to facilitate engineered protein complexes.

Citations
2

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMatic '22Bi '24Zhang '21Anantakrish '22Vo '26Gao '25
66% semantic matchBioinformatics
Marin Matic, Pasquale Miglionico, Asuka Inoue+1 more·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2022