Making sense of the linear genome, gene function and TADs
Helen LongiD, Simon Greenaway, George PowelliD, Ann‐Marie MalloniD, Cecilia M. LindgreniD, Michelle M. SimoniD
Abstract
BackgroundTopologically associating domains (TADs) are thought to act as functional units in the genome. TADs co-localise genes and their regulatory elements as well as forming the unit of genome switching between active and inactive compartments. This has led to the speculation that genes which are required for similar processes may fall within the same TADs, allowing them to share regulatory programs and efficiently switch between chromatin compartments. However, evidence to link genes within TADs to the same regulatory program is limited. ResultsWe investigated the functional similarity of genes which fall within the same TAD. To do this we developed a TAD randomisation algorithm to generate sets of "random TADs" to act as null distributions. We found that while pairs of paralogous genes are enriched in TADs overall, they are depleted in TADs with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) ChIP-seq peaks at both boundaries. By assessing gene constraint as a proxy for functional importance we found that genes which singly occupy a TAD have greater functional importance than genes which share a TAD, and these genes are enriched for developmental processes. We found little evidence that pairs of genes in CTCF bound TADs are more likely to be co-expressed or share functional annotations than can be explained by their linear proximity alone. ConclusionsThese results suggest that algorithmically defined TADs consist of two functionally different groups, those which are bound by CTCF and those which are not. We detected no association between genes sharing the same CTCF TADs and increased co- expression or functional similarity, other than that explained by linear genome proximity. We do however find that functionally important genes are more likely to fall within a TAD on their own suggesting that TADs play an important role in the insulation of these genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 46
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- TAD boundaries and gene activity are uncoupled
Faisal Almansour, Nadezda A. Fursova, … Tom Misteli·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026
- Functional dissection of TADs reveals non-essential and instructive roles in regulating gene expression
Alexandra Despang, Robert Schöpflin, … Daniel M. Ibrahim·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2019
- Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation
Jan Krefting, Miguel Angel Andrade-Navarro, Jonas Ibn-Salem·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2018
- A functional overlap between actively transcribed genes and chromatin boundary elements
Caroline L. Harrold, Matthew E. Gosden, … Douglas R. Higgs·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2020
- Evolutionary analysis of gene ages across TADs associates chromatin topology with whole genome duplications
Caelinn James, Marco Trevisán-Herraz, … Daniel Rico·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2024
- A complex CTCF binding code defines TAD boundary structure and function
Li‐Hsin Chang, Sourav Ghosh, … Daan Noordermeer·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2023