henhaobio
Sign in

Nature CommunicationsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Systematic benchmarking of tools for CpG methylation detection from Nanopore sequencing

Zaka Wing-Sze YueniD, Akanksha SrivastavaiD, Runa DanieliD, Dennis B. McNeviniD, Cameron JackiD, Eduardo EyrasiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode
Citations
171
FWCI
8.86
Field percentile
top 1%

Abstract

DNA methylation plays a fundamental role in the control of gene expression and genome integrity. Although there are multiple tools that enable its detection from Nanopore sequencing, their accuracy remains largely unknown. Here, we present a systematic benchmarking of tools for the detection of CpG methylation from Nanopore sequencing using individual reads, control mixtures of methylated and unmethylated reads, and bisulfite sequencing. We found that tools have a tradeoff between false positives and false negatives and present a high dispersion with respect to the expected methylation frequency values. We described various strategies to improve the accuracy of these tools, including a new consensus approach, METEORE (https://github.com/comprna/METEORE), based on the combination of the predictions from two or more tools that shows improved accuracy over individual tools. Snakemake pipelines are also provided for reproducibility and to enable the systematic application of our analyses to other datasets.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKulkarni '26Liu '21Genner '24Bonet '21Konanov '23Wang '26
82% semantic matchGenomics
Onkar Kulkarni, Reuben Jacob Mathew, Rhea Jana+6 more·Nature Communications·Jul 15, 2026· 12 citations