The shape of gene expression distributions matter: how incorporating distribution shape improves the interpretation of cancer transcriptomic data
Laurence de TorrentéiD, Samuel E. ZimmermaniD, Masako SuzukiiD, Maximilian ChristopeitiD, John M. GreallyiD, Jessica C. MariD
Abstract
In genomics, we often impose the assumption that gene expression data follows a specific distribution. However, rarely do we stop to question this assumption or consider its applicability to all genes in the transcriptome. Our study investigated the prevalence of genes with expression distributions that are non-Normal in three different tumor types from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Surprisingly, less than 50% of all genes were Normally-distributed, with other distributions including Gamma, Bimodal, Cauchy, and Lognormal were represented. Relevant information about cancer biology was captured by the genes with non-Normal gene expression. When used for classification, the set of non-Normal genes were able to discriminate between cancer patients with poor versus good survival status. Our results highlight the value of studying a genes distribution shape to model heterogeneity of transcriptomic data. These insights would have been overlooked when using standard approaches that assume all genes follow the same type of distribution in a patient cohort.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 61
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cancer as a tissue anomaly: classifying tumor transcriptomes based only on healthy data
Thomas P. Quinn, Thin Nguyen, … Svetha Venkatesh·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2019
- Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability
Aedan G. K. Roberts, Daniel Robin Catchpoole, Paul J Kennedy·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2022
- The impact of distributional assumptions in gene-set and pathway analysis: how far can it go wrong?
Chi-Hsuan Ho, Yu‐Jyun Huang, … Chuhsing Kate Hsiao·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2021
- Analyzing cancer gene expression data through the lens of normal tissue-specificity
H. R. Frost·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2021
- The geometry of normal tissue and cancer gene expression manifolds
Joan Nieves, Augusto González·Acta BiotheoreticaPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2024
- Genome-wide co-expression distributions as a metric to prioritize genes of functional importance
Pâmela A. Alexandre, Nicholas James Hudson, … Antônio Reverter·GenesPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020