bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Trial by trial, machine learning approach identifies temporally discrete Aδ- and C-fibre mediated laser evoked potentials that predict pain behaviour in rats.
Anna C. SalesiD, Anthony James BlockeeliD, John R. HuxteriD, James DunhamiD, Robert AR DrakeiD, Andrea TruiniiD, André MourauxiD, Rolf‐Detlef TreedeiD, K.G. Phillips, Anthony Edward PickeringiD
Abstract
Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) - the EEG response to temporally-discrete thermal stimuli - are commonly used in experimental pain studies in humans. Such stimuli selectively activate nociceptors and produce EEG features which correlate with pain intensity. The rodent LEP has been proposed to be a translational biomarker of nociception and pain, however its validity has been questioned because of reported differences in the classes of nociceptive fibres mediating the response. Here we use a machine learning, trial by trial analysis approach on wavelet-denoised LEPs generated by stimulation of the plantar hindpaw of rats. The LEP amplitude was more strongly related to behavioural response than to laser stimulus energy. A simple decision tree classifier using LEP features was able to predict behavioural responses with 73% accuracy. An examination of the features used by the classifier showed that mutually exclusive short and long latency LEP peaks were clearly seen in single-trial data, yet were not evident in grand average data pooled from multiple trials. This bimodal distribution of LEP latencies was mirrored in the paw withdrawal latencies which were preceded and predicted by the LEP responses. The proportion of short latency events was increased after intradermal application of high dose capsaicin (to defunctionalise TRPV1 expressing nociceptors), suggesting they were mediated by A{delta}-fibres (specifically AMH-I). These findings demonstrate that both C- and A{delta}-fibres contribute to rodent LEPs and concomitant behavioural responses, providing a real-time assay of specific fibre function in conscious animals. Single-trial analysis approaches can improve the utility of LEPs as a translatable biomarker of pain.
- organism: rat
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A comparison between the neural correlates of laser and electric pain stimulation and their modulation by expectation
Emily Hird, Anthony K. P. Jones, … Wael El‐Deredy·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2017
- A deep-learning driven investigation of circuit basis for reflexive hypersensitivity to pain
Prannay Reddy, Jayesh S Vasudeva, … Arnab Barik·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2023
- Distinct activation thresholds of unmyelinated C-fiber afferents by dorsal root ganglion and peripheral nerve stimulation
Longtu Chen, Jia Liu, … Bin Feng·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2026
- Investigations into an overlooked early component of painful nociceptive withdrawal reflex responses in humans
Oumie Thorell, Johannes Ydrefors, … Saad S. Nagi·Frontiers in Pain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2023
- Withdrawal latency in a human hot plate analog tracks inter-individual differences in pain sensitivity
Lars Keuter, Ole Goltermann, … Christian Büchel·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2026
- Pain reflects the informational value of nociceptive inputs.
Michel‐Pierre Coll, Zoey Walden, … Mathieu Roy·PainPeer-reviewed·May 7, 2024