bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
FROG Analysis Ensures the Reproducibility of Genome Scale Metabolic Models
Karthik RamaniD, Miroslav KratochvíliD, Brett G. OlivieriD, Matthias KönigiD, Pratyay SenguptaiD, Dinesh Kumar Kuppa BaskaraniD, Tung V. N. NguyeniD, Daniel LoboiD, St. Elmo WilkeniD, Krishna Kumar TiwariiD, Aswathy K. RaghuiD, Indumathi PalanikumariD, Lavanya RaajaraamiD, Maziya IbrahimiD, Sanjaay BalakrishnaniD, Shreyansh UmaleiD, Frank BergmanniD, Tanisha MalpaniiD, Venkata SatagopamiD, Reinhard SchneideriD, Moritz E. BeberiD, Sarah KeatingiD, Mihail AntoniD, Alina RenziD, Meiyappan LakshmananiD, , Rahuman S. Malik‐SheriffiD
Abstract
Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) and other constraint-based models (CBMs) play a pivotal role in understanding biological phenotypes and advancing research in areas like metabolic engineering, human disease modelling, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. Despite their growing application, a significant challenge remains in ensuring the reproducibility of GEMs, primarily due to inconsistent reporting and inadequate model documentation of model results. Addressing this gap, we introduce FROG analysis, a community-driven initiative aimed at standardizing reproducibility assessments of CBMs and GEMs. The FROG framework encompasses four key analyses--Flux variability, Reaction deletion, Objective function, and Gene deletion--to produce standardized, numerically reproducible FROG reports. These reports serve as reference datasets, enabling model evaluators, curators, and independent researchers to verify the reproducibility of GEMs systematically. BioModels, a leading repository of systems biology models, has integrated FROG analysis into its curation workflow, enhancing the reproducibility and reusability of submitted GEMs. In our study evaluating 65 GEM submissions from the community, approximately 40% reproduced without intervention, 28% requiring minor adjustments, and 32% needing input from authors. The standardization introduced by FROG analysis facilitated the detection and resolution of issues, ultimately leading to the successful reproduction of all models. By establishing a standardized and comprehensive approach to evaluating GEM reproducibility, FROG analysis significantly contributes to making CBMs and GEMs more transparent, reusable, and reliable for the broader scientific community.
- Citations
- 9
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Standard-GEM supports reproducible development of genome-scale metabolic models
Mihail Anton, Eivind Almaas, … Eduard Johannes Kerkhoven·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2023
- Memote: A community-driven effort towards a standardized genome-scale metabolic model test suite
Christian Lieven, Moritz E. Beber, … Cheng Zhang·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2020
- Community standards to facilitate development and address challenges in metabolic modeling
Maureen A. Carey, Andreas Dräger, … James T. Yurkovich·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Comparative analysis of metabolic models of microbial communities reconstructed from automated tools and consensus approaches
Yunli Eric Hsieh, Kshitij Tandon, … Zoran Nikoloski·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2024
- Network reconstruction and modelling made reproducible with moped
Nima P. Saadat, Marvin van Aalst, Oliver Ebenhöh·MetabolitesPeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2022
- Gsmodutils: A python based framework for test-driven genome scale metabolic model development
James Gilbert, Nicole Pearcy, … Jamie Twycross·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2019