Additive effects of environmental and demographic variation shape the repeatability of evolution across replicated experiments
Karen BisschopiD, Meike Tessa WorteliD, Ken KraaijeveldiD, Janine MariëniD, Isabel RathmanniD, Dries BonteiD, Steven DeclerckiD, Marjon G. J. de VosiD, Rampal S. EtienneiD, Steven GoosensiD, Jan E. KammengaiD, Frederik MortieriD, Joost A. G. RikseniD, Maurijn van der ZeeiD, Koen J. F. VerhoeveniD, Suzanne WiezeriD, Lars Zandbergen, Martijn EgasiD, Jacintha EllersiD, Astrid T. GrootiD, Marcel E. VisseriD, Thomas BlankersiD
Abstract
The repeatability of evolution is fundamentally important for understanding the origin and diversification of life as well as for developing evolutionary forecasting tools. Repeatability is limited by stochasticity, here defined as changes that are independent of genotypic fitness effects. Over short timescales, the two main sources of stochasticity of evolutionary change are environmental stochasticity and demographic (life-history) stochasticity. Quantifying the relative importance of these two sources of stochasticity in driving fitness outcomes is crucially important for predicting evolutionary responses. To gain insights in the effects of stochasticity, five institutes replicated an evolutionary experiment exposing Caenorhabditis elegans to novel rearing conditions. Replication across the institutes led to variation in selective environments, e.g. through divergent microbiomes among institutes. Replication within institutes was done across demographic treatments that influence the potential for population-size dependent fluctuations in allele frequencies (drift) and genetic hitchhiking (draft). We found high among-institute variation in fitness outcomes, which was partially explained by variation in microbiota. Whereas lab-specific effects explained most of the variance in mean fitness, the repeatability of fitness outcomes depended more on demographic heterogeneity. Specifically, population bottlenecks resulted in high among-replicate variation in fitness. When combined, environmental and demographic stochasticity additively reduced repeatability, underlining their additive importance in developing evolutionary forecasting tools. These results further highlight the importance of statistically integrating heterogeneity in experimental evolution to identify factors constraining outcome repeatability and study replicability.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 1th percentile
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Population bottleneck has only marginal effect on fitness evolution and its repeatability in dioecious C. elegans
K. Bisschop, T. Blankers, … J. Ellers·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2021
- Evolutionary rescue under demographic and environmental stochasticity
K. Xu, T. Vision, M. R. Servedio·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2023
- Predicting population genetic change in an experimental stochastic environment
M. Rescan, D. Grulois, … L.-M. Chevin·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021
- Selection and drift determine phenotypic stasis despite genetic divergence
F. Mallard, L. Noble, … H. Teotonio·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2019
- Non-ergodicity in ecology and evolution
Teemu Kuosmanen, Alexandre Minetto, Ville Mustonen·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2026
- Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study
A. Milcu, R. Puga-Freitas, … J. Roy·Nature Ecology & EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2018